Editing a Persuasive Speech for Time and Emphasis
Students must deliver a 3-minute persuasive speech (about 400 words at a natural pace) arguing that their school should fund a peer-tutoring program. Mei's draft is 620 words. It opens with a 90-word anecdote about her cousin's experience at a different school, includes three separate statistics, a long list of eight possible subjects for tutoring, and a conclusion that repeats the introduction almost word for word. She speaks quickly when nervous and has been told her main argument - that tutoring helps both tutees and tutors - gets lost.
1. Mei must cut roughly 220 words. Recommend what to cut first and what to protect, with reasons.
Read the worked answer
Cut first:
- The cousin anecdote (about 90 words). It is set at a different school, so it does not establish a need here, and it delays her own argument past the point where an audience decides whether to listen. Replace with one sentence of local context, or cut entirely.
- The list of eight subjects (roughly 25–35 words). A list of eight is hard to follow by ear and adds no persuasive weight. 'Subjects across the curriculum' does the same work in five words.
- The repeated conclusion (about 40–50 words). Repetition of the introduction wastes the slot where the audience expects a final, memorable claim. Rewrite it to state the ask once, clearly.
- One of the three statistics. Keep the two strongest and the one most local to the school; three figures delivered quickly blur together.
Protect: the two-way benefit argument - tutoring helps tutees and tutors. That is her distinctive claim and the one the teacher says is getting lost. It should appear in the first thirty seconds and again in the conclusion, in different words.
Word budget after cuts: roughly 400 words, which at her nervous speaking pace may still run long, so she should rehearse with a timer.
2. Mei speaks quickly when nervous. How should she adjust the structure of the speech to manage pace and emphasis?
Read the worked answer
Structural adjustments rather than 'just slow down' advice:
- Short sentences at the start. A fast speaker's first thirty seconds set the pace for everything after. Opening with three short sentences ('Our school has a problem. Some students are falling behind. Others could help.') forces pauses between them and gives her a natural brake.
- Signposted sections. Two or three explicit markers ('First… Second… So here is what I am asking') create built-in pause points and help the audience track the two-way benefit argument.
- One number, spoken slowly. If she keeps two statistics, she should isolate each in its own sentence with nothing else in it, so the figure is not buried in a rush of clauses.
- A rehearsed final line. A memorised closing sentence - short, concrete, and delivered after a deliberate pause - gives her a controlled ending instead of trailing off at speed.
- Rehearse with a timer and a listener. The 3-minute limit is a hard constraint; a listener can signal when she is speeding up, which she may not notice herself.
These changes work on the written text, which she controls, rather than relying on in-the-moment self-monitoring, which is unreliable under nerves.