The Creative Response: Balancing Originality and Textual Fidelity
Student Sam is writing a creative response for his folio, transforming a scene from a Shakespeare play into a modern setting. He has chosen to rewrite the balcony scene from Romeo and Juliet, setting it in a high school. He wants to keep the original language but update the context. His draft has Romeo texting Juliet instead of speaking, but using Shakespeare's lines: 'But soft, what light from yonder window breaks? / It is the east, and Juliet is the sun.' His teacher says the piece feels confused: the language is archaic but the setting is modern, and the effect is unintentionally comic. Sam argues that he is being faithful to the original while transforming it. He has 1000 words and has written 600.
1. Evaluate Sam's approach. What are the strengths and weaknesses of mixing original Shakespearean language with a modern setting?
Read the worked answer
The strength is that Sam demonstrates close knowledge of the original text and attempts intertextuality. However, the weakness is tonal inconsistency: Shakespeare's elevated verse clashes with a high school texting context, creating a jarring effect that may undermine the intended emotional impact. The transformation is superficial because only the setting has changed, not the language or the medium in a way that illuminates the original. For a successful transformation, Sam needs to make deliberate choices about what to preserve and what to adapt. For example, he could translate the verse into modern teenage slang to show how the sentiment remains relevant, or he could keep the verse but set it in a context where such language is plausible (e.g., a drama rehearsal). The key is to ensure the transformation reveals something new about the original or its themes, rather than simply dressing it in modern clothes.
2. Sam has 400 words left. Suggest a specific revision that would make his transformation more effective, and explain why it would work.
Read the worked answer
Sam could revise the scene so that Romeo's texting is in modern English, but Juliet's replies are in Shakespeare's original lines (or vice versa), creating a deliberate contrast between old and new. For example, Romeo texts: 'u up? saw a light in ur window lol' while Juliet responds: 'O Romeo, Romeo! wherefore art thou Romeo?' This juxtaposition could highlight the timelessness of the emotion while acknowledging the changed medium. Alternatively, he could keep the original lines but frame them as a school production, so the archaic language is justified. With 400 words left, he could rewrite the opening 200 words to establish this framing, then continue. This revision would demonstrate conscious crafting and intertextual awareness, which are rewarded in Creating Texts. It would also resolve the tonal confusion by making the contrast intentional rather than accidental.