The Group Folio With Uneven Contribution
A Year 12 IPP class completes a school-assessed group investigation worth 20% of the subject grade. The task requires each student to submit an individual folio of evidence plus a jointly produced prototype database. The class of 24 works in six groups of four. In Group 3, Priya built the entire database schema and wrote 70% of the documentation; Sam ran usability tests and wrote 20%; Jordan produced the logo and wrote 5%; and Alex attended three of eight scheduled meetings, contributed 5% of text, and missed the final submission deadline by emailing their section two days late. The teacher must assign individual grades against the performance standards, which describe evidence of individual understanding. Alex's parent has emailed arguing that the group mark should be shared equally because 'the school never told us contributions would be separated.' The task sheet does say the folio is individually assessed, but the section on group work is vague about how uneven effort is handled.
1. Identify the main assessment judgement the teacher must make and explain the principle from school assessment that governs it.
Read the worked answer
The teacher must decide whether to grade Alex on the group product or on Alex's own demonstrated evidence. Under school assessment principles, a group task must still yield an individual grade based on each student's own evidence against the performance standards. The joint prototype can be evidence, but the teacher cannot award marks for work Alex did not do. The governing principle is validity: the assessment must measure the individual student's achievement, not the group's. Alex's 5% text contribution, missed meetings and late section are the relevant evidence. The parent's fairness argument is understandable but does not override validity - a shared mark would misrepresent Alex's achievement. The teacher should document the contribution record and grade Alex against the standards using what Alex actually produced, while noting the late submission separately if the task sheet specifies a penalty.
2. Describe how the teacher should handle the late submission and the parent complaint procedurally.
Read the worked answer
The teacher should first check the task sheet and school policy for a stated late penalty and apply it consistently with how other students were treated. Procedural fairness requires that Alex be told the outcome and the reason, and be given an opportunity to respond before the grade is finalised. The teacher should keep a written record of contribution evidence (meeting attendance, version history, submitted drafts) so the individual judgement is defensible. For the parent complaint, the teacher should explain the individual-evidence principle in plain language, show the task sheet wording, and, if the parent remains dissatisfied, refer the matter to the faculty head under the school's review process rather than negotiating the mark directly. The teacher should not simply average marks to appease the parent, because that would breach validity and consistency with other groups.