Choosing evidence for an oral presentation on a village festival
A student must give a 5-minute Tamil oral presentation about a temple festival in her grandparents' village. She has three sources: (1) a 1978 Tamil-language magazine article describing the festival procession, (2) a 2019 YouTube video with spoken commentary in Tamil, and (3) her grandmother's account recorded last month. The school requires at least two sources, and every claim about the past must be traceable. Her draft says: 'The festival has always included a night procession with drums.' She plans to cite the magazine and the video for this claim, but the video only shows the daytime rituals. She has 4 minutes of usable audio from her grandmother, who mentions the night procession but cannot recall when it began. Her teacher has warned against presenting family memory as settled history.
1. Which sources can support the claim that the night procession is an established part of the festival, and how should the student revise the claim?
Read the worked answer
The magazine (1978) can support a claim about the past, because it is a dated published description of the procession. The grandmother's recording can support a claim about her own experience, not about origins. The video cannot support the night-procession claim because it shows only daytime rituals; using it would be a mismatch between evidence and claim. The student should therefore narrow the claim: 'A night procession with drums was described in a 1978 magazine article, and my grandmother remembers it from her youth.' She should drop 'always', which no source establishes. This keeps every part of the claim traceable to a named source.
2. The student wants to use the grandmother's recording as a second source to satisfy the two-source rule. Evaluate whether this meets the requirement and what she should add.
Read the worked answer
The recording is a legitimate source, but it is oral testimony from one person about her own lifetime, so it cannot carry the same weight as a published dated record. It can satisfy the two-source rule only if the student uses it for what it can actually show: personal recollection and details of the ritual. She should add a third, independent source, such as a local temple record or a later article, to corroborate the procession's continuity. In the presentation she should distinguish explicitly between 'documented in 1978' and 'remembered by my grandmother', because conflating the two would present family memory as settled history, which the teacher warned against.