The Camera in the Lobby
You are the team leader for a five-day protection task at a city hotel. On day three, a junior officer reports that a man has been in the lobby café for four hours on two consecutive days, always seated with a view of the lifts, always leaving shortly after the principal's vehicle departs. The officer has photographs on a personal phone. The man has not approached, spoken to anyone, or broken any law. The hotel's duty manager says the man is a paying guest and refuses to ask him to leave. Your client is anxious and wants him 'removed'.
1. How do you handle the observation, the photographs, and the client's demand?
Read the worked answer
The observation. This is a textbook pattern: same place, same vantage point, timing keyed to the principal. It is not proof, but it is enough to treat as hostile reconnaissance until disproved. I task a second officer to corroborate independently, note exact times, clothing, vehicle if any, and whether he photographs or uses a phone when the principal moves. I do not have officers stare at him; that teaches him he is seen and tells him what we know.
The photographs. The officer was right to notice and wrong to use a personal phone. Images of a person who has committed no offence, held on unsecured personal equipment, are a data protection problem and a discipline matter. I have them transferred to the company's managed system under a documented incident reference, deleted from the phone in the officer's presence, and I speak to him privately: the instinct was correct, the method was not. I do not humiliate him in front of the team; I do fix the behaviour.
The client. 'Removed' is not something I can deliver. The man is a paying guest doing nothing unlawful; the hotel will not act and should not. What I can do:
- Change the principal's pattern: different lift, different times, a different exit, so the observation yields nothing.
- Ask the hotel to note him and to alert us to any request for the principal's floor or room number.
- Prepare a police referral if he approaches, photographs the principal, or attempts access.
- Tell the client the truth: we are managing, not removing, and here is what would change that.
Managing an anxious client means giving them a plan, not a promise I cannot keep.
2. On day four the man approaches the principal in the lobby and asks for a selfie. What now?
Read the worked answer
The approach changes the assessment, but not into an attack. Most likely he is an enthusiast or journalist. The protective response should be proportionate.
Immediate:
- One officer steps between the man and the principal, at a slight angle, hands visible, voice calm. The principal is moved back and to the side, not hurried out, unless the man's behaviour escalates.
- The officer's first words are a boundary, not a threat: 'Step back, please. You can't approach him.'
- A second officer watches the man's hands and the surrounding lobby, because an approach can be a distraction for a second person.
If he complies: the principal may choose to give a selfie. That is the principal's call; my job is to make it safe: one photo, no phone handed over, no personal details, then the principal moves on.
If he refuses or escalates: officers create distance, hotel security is called, and police if there is a threat or an assault. Use of force is the minimum necessary to protect the principal, no more.
Afterwards:
- The man is now identified. Name, if volunteered, is recorded; if not, the hotel's guest records are a matter for the hotel and police, not for us.
- The pattern is re-examined: four hours a day for two days is more than fandom. It may be fixation. I recommend the client's office be told, and consider a police notification so there is a record if it recurs.
- The team debriefs: the junior officer's observation was the reason we were ready, and that is worth saying out loud.