Settlement Fails and the Trade That Would Not Settle
A fund manager buys 12 million of a thinly traded corporate bond on T+2. On settlement day the seller's custodian does not deliver because the bonds are held in a different depository than the one named in the instructions. The fund has already sold a related position expecting the bonds to be in hand. Two days later the trade is still failing, the fund's counterparty is demanding compensation, and the fund's custodian reports a growing negative cash balance. The manager asks whether the trade can simply be cancelled and whether the fund can claim the missed on-sale profit.
1. Explain what has gone wrong in the settlement chain and who bears responsibility.
Read the worked answer
The failure is operational, not a market event. Settlement requires the seller to deliver securities against the buyer's payment on the agreed date, through the depository and accounts specified in the settlement instructions. If the bonds sit in a different depository, the delivery instruction cannot match, so the seller's custodian cannot settle. Responsibility for correct standing settlement instructions rests with the seller and its custodian; the buyer's obligation is to have cash and correct receiving instructions ready, which appears to have been done.
The buyer's custodian should have flagged the mismatch earlier. The chain to check is: trade capture and confirmation (are the depository, account, and reference data correct?), matching (did both sides agree instructions?), and the depository's own matching. A mismatch at the depository is a straight-through-processing break, and the fix is to amend instructions and re-present, not to cancel. The manager should escalate to the seller's custodian and to the depository, and document each step with timestamps.
2. Evaluate the manager's two requests: cancelling the trade and claiming the missed on-sale profit.
Read the worked answer
Cancellation is not a unilateral right. A confirmed trade is a binding contract; it can be cancelled only by mutual agreement (a cancel-and-rebook) or under the rules of the market or the master agreement. Unwinding without agreement leaves the fund in breach. The practical route is to push for delivery, or to agree a buy-in: the buyer sources the bonds elsewhere and charges the failing seller the cost. Many markets have formal buy-in procedures with notice periods.
Claiming the missed on-sale profit is harder. The fund's loss on the related sale is a consequential loss, and recovery depends on the contractual terms - the master agreement, any settlement failure indemnity, and local market rules. The fund should quantify the loss, preserve evidence (the on-sale trade, the price difference, funding costs on the negative cash balance), and make a written claim. It should not assume full recovery; many regimes limit claims to direct costs and buy-in differences. The manager should also review why the on-sale was executed before the purchase settled.
3. What controls would prevent a repeat of this failure?
Read the worked answer
Pre-trade: validate standing settlement instructions and depository eligibility for the instrument before execution, and flag illiquid bonds with unusual settlement venues. Add a check that the security is deliverable in the fund's depository. Trade date: confirm depository, account, and reference data match on both sides, and use automated matching rather than manual instructions. Pre-settlement: run a T+1 exception report on unmatched trades and escalate by a defined deadline. Inventory discipline: do not sell a position before the buy has settled unless the fund holds a buffer or has an explicit short-sale capability. Post-trade: track fail rates and aging, maintain a buy-in playbook with notice templates, and reconcile cash daily so negative balances are caught immediately. Also review counterparty selection for illiquid instruments.