SIAA Securities & Managed Investments study materials
SIAA Securities & Managed Investments study resources

Suitability Under Pressure

SIAA Securities & Managed Investments · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Suitability Under Pressure

A 34-year-old client, Raj, earns £95,000, has £12,000 in savings, a £240,000 mortgage, and no dependants. He wants to invest £40,000 inherited from a grandparent into a single thematic technology fund with a 0.9% fee and high volatility. He states a 3-year horizon because he plans to buy a house. His risk questionnaire scores him as balanced (4/7), but he insists he is 'comfortable with risk' and has read about the fund online. The adviser's firm restricts single-fund concentration to 25% of investable assets. Raj has no emergency fund beyond the £12,000 and no protection cover.

1. Identify the suitability conflicts and explain how the adviser should resolve them.

Read the worked answer

Three conflicts: (1) Horizon mismatch - a 3-year need against a highly volatile single-sector fund means a market drawdown could hit exactly when funds are needed; equities are generally unsuitable for short horizons. (2) Concentration - £40,000 in one fund breaches the firm's 25% limit if his investable assets are around £52,000, and single-fund exposure adds idiosyncratic risk. (3) Stated risk appetite versus capacity for loss - his questionnaire score of 4/7 does not support a high-volatility thematic fund. The adviser must prioritise capacity for loss over stated appetite, explain the mismatch in writing, and either recommend a diversified solution with a cash/short-dated component for the house deposit or decline to proceed. Record the rationale.

2. Draft the key points the adviser should cover in the suitability discussion and the documentation required.

Read the worked answer

Cover: the purpose of the money and the 3-year deadline; the difference between willingness and ability to take risk; the effect of a 30-40% drawdown on a £40,000 pot; fees (0.9% plus platform and advice costs) and their compounding drag; the absence of an emergency fund and protection cover; and the firm's concentration rule. Offer alternatives: keep the house deposit in cash or short-dated gilts, invest a smaller diversified amount, and build an emergency fund. Document the client's objectives, risk profile, the mismatch, the alternatives offered, and his informed decision, including a signed acknowledgement if he proceeds against advice. Retain records per conduct rules.