The Sound Design Nobody Can Hear
A 120-seat proscenium theatre presents a 100-minute play with live underscoring at four moments and recorded sound at eleven cues. During the first technical rehearsal, the sound designer reports that the live musicians, positioned in a downstage corner, are inaudible under the recorded music at two of the four moments, and that the actors' unamplified voices are being covered by the recorded underscoring at a third. The theatre has no body microphones and the budget does not allow renting them. The composer has delivered finished recordings and does not want them altered. The director has two tech days left before previews. The stage manager notes that the two inaudible moments occur when the musicians are playing in the same register as the recorded track.
1. Identify the cause of the masking and propose fixes that do not require new equipment or altering the composer's recordings.
Read the worked answer
The stage manager's observation is the diagnosis: the live musicians and the recorded track occupy the same register at the two inaudible moments, so the live sound is masked rather than merely quiet. Masking is a frequency problem, not a volume problem, so raising the live players or lowering the recorded track would help only partly and would worsen the third moment, where the recorded underscoring covers unamplified voices. Fixes available without new equipment or altered recordings: move the musicians out of the downstage corner to a position where their sound reaches the house without competing with the recorded speakers, which is a placement decision, not a recording change; re-time the recorded cues so they do not overlap the live moments in the same register, which uses the composer's recordings as delivered; and at the third moment, either shorten the recorded underscoring or move it under a pause rather than under dialogue. Each fix is a staging or cue-timing decision within the director's authority and none requires body mics or a re-mix.
2. Recommend how to use the two remaining tech days to verify the fixes, given that previews follow immediately.
Read the worked answer
Two tech days is enough for verification only if the fixes are decided before the first of them, so day one should begin with the changes already in place rather than with discussion. Day one: run the four live-music moments and the third dialogue moment in isolation, with the sound designer at the desk and the director in the house seats at the back and at the sides, since masking often differs by seat. Confirm audibility at both positions before moving on. Day two: run the full show with the revised cue timings and placement, and stop only for sound problems. The verification standard should be stated in advance: the live musicians audible at the back row, and the actors' voices intelligible under the third underscoring. If a fix fails on day one, revert to the previous placement rather than improvising a new one on day two, because there is no time to test a third option. The judgement is to protect the preview by verifying a small number of decided fixes rather than exploring alternatives during tech.
3. The composer objects to re-timing the recorded cues. How should the director proceed?
Read the worked answer
The director should separate the composer's ownership of the recordings from the director's ownership of cue placement. Re-timing a cue so it does not overlap a live moment does not alter the recording; it changes when it plays, which is a production decision. The director should explain the specific problem in the composer's terms: at two moments the live players and the track share a register and the live sound disappears, and at a third the track covers unamplified voices, which the theatre cannot fix with microphones. Then offer the composer a choice among the fixes that preserve the recordings, such as moving the musicians or shortening the overlap rather than cutting a cue. If the composer still objects, the director should make the call and document it, because the audience's ability to hear the actors is not negotiable and the budget forecloses the alternative. The relationship is worth protecting, so the conversation should happen before the second tech day, not during it.