Reading a Poster That Fails Its Brief
A student designs an A3 poster for a school concert. Requirements: the event name must be legible from 3 m, the date and venue must be clear, and the design should feel energetic. The submitted poster uses a thin, light-weight script typeface for the band name at 18 pt, set in pale yellow on a white background; the date is in 10 pt grey at the bottom edge; the venue is omitted; a large photo of a guitar dominates 70% of the page. The student says it 'looks cool.' A peer reviewer says it is 'fine.'
1. Analyse the poster against the brief using contrast, hierarchy, and legibility, and identify the specific failures.
Read the worked answer
Contrast: pale yellow type on white has very low value contrast, so the band name nearly disappears; this alone breaks the 3 m legibility requirement. Hierarchy: the guitar photo occupies 70% of the page and is the highest-contrast element, so it becomes the focal point instead of the event name. The date at 10 pt grey is the weakest element and sits at the bottom edge, where it is easily cropped or missed. The venue is absent, which is a content failure, not a style choice.
Legibility: an 18 pt thin script at 3 m is far below readable size; script faces with thin strokes lose definition at distance. The 'energetic' feel is carried only by the photo, not by the typography, so the design's energy does not serve communication. The peer's 'fine' judgement is unreliable because it is unanchored to the brief's criteria; a useful critique must test the poster against legibility distance, required information, and intended mood.
2. Propose a prioritised set of revisions and explain how you would test whether the revised poster meets the brief.
Read the worked answer
Prioritised revisions: (1) Add the venue - a missing required element outranks aesthetic fixes. (2) Rebuild hierarchy: make the event name the largest, highest-contrast element, using a bold or heavy sans-serif at a size readable at 3 m (roughly 60–100 pt depending on viewing conditions), in dark type on light or light on dark. (3) Increase contrast: abandon pale yellow on white; use a dark ground or a strong complementary pairing. (4) Raise the date to a secondary level (around 24–30 pt) and keep it clear of the trim edge. (5) Reduce the guitar photo to 40–50% and let typography carry energy through scale, angle, or colour.
Testing: print at A3, place it 3 m away, and ask viewers who have not seen it to read the name, date, and venue - if any cannot, revise. Squint-test for hierarchy (the name should remain dominant when blurred). Finally, check the design against each brief requirement as a checklist rather than relying on 'looks cool' or 'fine,' which are not criteria.