Evaluating Two Sources for a Persuasive Oral on Language Maintenance
A student prepares a persuasive oral in Bengali arguing that Bengali-language weekend schools should receive council funding. She has two sources. Source A is a council report stating that 1,200 residents speak Bengali at home and that weekend school attendance fell 15 percent over three years. Source B is a passionate blog post by a community member claiming that 'thousands of children are losing their mother tongue every year' and blaming the council. The oral must be five minutes, must use evidence, and must acknowledge a counterargument. The student likes Source B because it is emotionally powerful.
1. Evaluate the reliability and usefulness of both sources for a persuasive oral that must use evidence.
Read the worked answer
Source A is more reliable for evidence: it is an official report with specific figures (1,200 speakers, a 15 percent decline), which can support the claim that demand exists and that action is needed. Its limitation is that it gives statistics without explaining causes. Source B is emotionally engaging but unreliable as evidence: 'thousands' is vague and unverified, and the blame framing is opinion. It can be used sparingly to illustrate community feeling, clearly attributed as a community viewpoint, but not as the factual backbone. A persuasive oral needs credible evidence, so Source A should carry the argument while Source B may supply tone.
2. The student wants to use Source B's emotional force. Advise how to incorporate it responsibly and how to handle its weakness.
Read the worked answer
She can quote a short phrase from Source B to convey community concern, but must attribute it clearly as a community member's view rather than a fact. She should avoid repeating the unverified 'thousands' figure, or if she mentions it, explicitly note that it is an estimate not confirmed by data. Pairing the quote with Source A's verified 15 percent decline gives emotional resonance backed by evidence. This is responsible because it does not mislead the audience and it distinguishes fact from opinion, which strengthens her credibility.
3. The oral must acknowledge a counterargument. Identify a plausible counterargument and explain how the student should respond using the sources.
Read the worked answer
A plausible counterargument is that council funds are limited and should support services used by the whole community, not one language group. The student should acknowledge this fairly, then respond that the 1,200 Bengali speakers are part of the community and that a 15 percent attendance decline signals a risk of losing a shared asset. She can argue that modest funding preserves a service that supports children's literacy and identity. She should avoid dismissing the counterargument; conceding its logic and then rebutting with evidence makes her persuasion stronger and shows balanced judgement.