The Counter-Argument That Isn't
A student writing a persuasive piece on lowering the voting age to 16 includes a paragraph beginning: 'Some people say 16-year-olds are too immature to vote. But this is obviously wrong, and anyone who thinks so is out of touch.' The teacher marks the paragraph as a failed counter-argument. The student protests that they did address the opposing view. The assessed task rewards acknowledging and rebutting counter-arguments, and the student has 15 minutes to rewrite the paragraph so it actually rebuts rather than dismisses.
1. Explain why the student's paragraph fails as a counter-argument despite mentioning the opposing view.
Read the worked answer
Mentioning an opposing view is not the same as rebutting it. The paragraph states the objection ('too immature to vote') and then dismisses it with an insult ('out of touch') rather than engaging with it.
A genuine rebuttal must represent the opposing view fairly, then give a reason why it fails - for example, by citing evidence that 16-year-olds demonstrate civic reasoning in other contexts, or by pointing out that the same maturity standard is not applied to other adult responsibilities.
Dismissing opponents as 'out of touch' also damages the writer's credibility. Audiences are persuaded by fair engagement, not contempt. The paragraph currently weakens the argument it was meant to strengthen.
2. Rewrite the paragraph as a genuine counter-argument and rebuttal in 3-4 sentences.
Read the worked answer
Sample: 'Critics argue that 16-year-olds lack the maturity to vote responsibly. This concern is reasonable, but it rests on an assumption the evidence does not support: 16-year-olds already make consequential decisions about work, taxes and education, and studies of civic knowledge show they reason about public issues at least as well as many adults. If we trust them to pay tax, we should trust them to have a say in how it is spent. Maturity is not a fixed threshold we cross at 18; it is a capacity we develop, and voting is one of the ways we develop it.'
The rewrite states the objection fairly, concedes its plausibility, rebuts it with reasons and evidence, and turns it into support for the writer's position.