The Market Stall's Expansion
Saffron Thread is a food enterprise run by two siblings, Mira and Dev, selling packaged spice blends at a weekly farmers' market. In the past year they sold 9,600 units at $14 each, with ingredient and packaging costs of $5.20 per unit and market stall fees of $14,400 for the year. They do all production themselves in a certified home kitchen, working roughly 30 hours a week each. A regional grocer has offered to stock the range in six stores, which would require about 30,000 units a year, a commercial kitchen lease at $38,000 annually, one part-time employee at $34,000, and a wholesale price of $9.50 per unit. Mira wants to accept because 'volume solves everything'. Dev is worried they would be working for the grocer rather than for themselves, and notes they would have to give up the market stall to find the hours.
1. Calculate the current profitability of Saffron Thread and compare it with the projected profitability of the grocer contract.
Read the worked answer
Do both calculations before judging.
Current position: revenue = 9,600 × $14 = $134,400. Variable costs = 9,600 × $5.20 = $49,920. Contribution = $84,480. Less stall fees $14,400 = $70,080 annual profit, before any payment for the siblings' own 60 combined hours per week.
Grocer contract: revenue = 30,000 × $9.50 = $285,000. Variable costs = 30,000 × $5.20 = $156,000. Contribution = $129,000. Less commercial kitchen $38,000 and employee $34,000 = $57,000 profit, again before paying the siblings.
The finding: the contract more than triples revenue and more than triples unit volume, yet profit falls by about $13,000. The wholesale price of $9.50 leaves a contribution of only $4.30 per unit against $8.80 at the market. Fixed costs of $72,000 consume more than half the contribution. Mira's claim that volume solves everything is arithmetically false here: the contract adds volume at a lower margin and adds fixed costs that the market stall never carried.
A strong answer also notes the hidden cost: the siblings currently earn $70,080 for their own labour; under the contract they would earn $57,000 while working more hours to produce triple the volume, so their effective hourly return collapses.
2. Dev proposes negotiating a wholesale price of $11.00 with the grocer. Calculate the profit at that price and advise the siblings on their negotiating position.
Read the worked answer
At $11.00: contribution per unit = $11.00 − $5.20 = $5.80. Total contribution = 30,000 × $5.80 = $174,000. Less fixed costs $72,000 = $102,000 profit. That comfortably exceeds the current $70,080 and would justify the disruption.
Break-even wholesale price: the contract needs to cover $72,000 in fixed costs plus match the current $70,080, i.e. $142,080 of contribution, or $4.736 per unit. Adding the $5.20 variable cost gives a break-even price of about $9.94. So the grocer's $9.50 is below the price at which the contract is worth doing at all; $11.00 is the target, and anything above $9.94 is at least not worse than staying put.
Advice: Dev's instinct is right but should be expressed as a number, not a feeling. The siblings should counter at $11.00, citing the commercial kitchen requirement and the fact that 30,000 units is a step change in their operation. They should also test whether the grocer will accept a smaller initial order - say three stores - which lowers the fixed-cost commitment and lets them prove demand before leasing a kitchen. If the grocer will not move above $9.94, declining is the rational choice, because the contract would trade a profitable small business for a larger, less profitable one.