Honourifics Under Pressure: Reporting on a Grandparent's Visit
For the theme of family and generations, you must write a 150-word Korean reflection on a visit to your grandmother's house in a rural town. Your draft contains these problems: you refer to your grandmother as '그녀' twice; you write '할머니가 밥을 먹었어요' when describing the meal she served you; you describe your own action as '제가 할머니께 진지를 드셨습니다'; and you use '우리 할머니' in the title but '저의 할머니' in the first line. Your teacher's feedback says: 'Subject honourifics and humble forms are being applied to the wrong person. Fix the referents, not just the endings.' The reflection must also mention a specific object (a brass rice bowl) and one generational difference you noticed.
1. Correct the four problems and explain the rule governing each, naming the referent in every case.
Read the worked answer
'그녀' → '할머니'. Korean third-person pronouns are not neutral; '그녀' is a translated-novel register and, applied to a grandmother, sounds distant or disrespectful. Repeat the kinship term or omit the subject.
'할머니가 밥을 먹었어요' → '할머니께서 진지를 드셨어요' (or '식사하셨어요'). The subject is the grandmother, so the subject honourific particle -께서 and the honourific verb 드시다/잡수시다 are required; 밥 → 진지 raises the noun. Note that 드시다 is used for the honoured subject, not the speaker.
'제가 할머니께 진지를 드셨습니다' → '제가 할머니께 진지를 올렸습니다' (or '대접했습니다'). The error is applying an honourific verb to the speaker's own action. When the speaker acts toward an honoured person, the verb must be humble (올리다, 모시다, 여쭙다), not honourific.
'우리 할머니' is the natural form for one's own family in Korean; '저의 할머니' is grammatical but stiff and, in a title, unnatural. Standardise on '우리 할머니'.
2. Explain why the teacher says to 'fix the referents, not just the endings', using one of the four errors as evidence.
Read the worked answer
Because honourific endings are only correct relative to a referent. In error 3, the ending -셨습니다 is itself a well-formed honourific; the sentence fails because the referent of that honourific is the speaker, who must be humbled, not raised. Changing the ending alone (e.g. to -았습니다) would produce '제가 할머니께 진지를 먹었습니다', which is still wrong: the issue is the choice of verb (먹다 vs 올리다), which encodes the direction of deference between two people. Similarly, error 2 cannot be fixed by endings alone if the noun remains 밥; the noun itself carries the register.
So the revision must first establish who is honoured (grandmother) and who is humbled (speaker), then select particles (-께서 vs -이/가), verbs (드시다 vs 올리다), and nouns (진지 vs 밥) consistently. Endings are the surface; the referent map is the rule.
3. Revise the opening three sentences in Korean (about 50 words) so they include the brass rice bowl and one generational difference, keeping the honourific system consistent.
Read the worked answer
Model revision: '우리 할머니는 시골에서 혼자 사십니다. 지난 방학에 할머니 댁에 다녀왔는데, 부엌 찬장에는 놋그릇이 가지런히 놓여 있었습니다. 할머니께서는 그중 놋밥그릇에 진지를 담아 주시며, 예전에는 이 그릇으로 온 가족이 함께 먹었다고 하셨습니다. 저는 그 이야기를 들으며, 요즘은 각자 그릇에 담아 먹는 우리 식탁과 많이 다르다는 생각을 했습니다.'
Checks: '할머니는' as topic (no honourific particle needed for simple topic marking), '사십니다' honourific for the grandmother's action; '할머니께서는 … 담아 주시며 … 하셨습니다' keeps the grandmother as honoured subject throughout; '저는 … 생각을 했습니다' uses plain humble-neutral form for the speaker's own action. The generational difference (shared serving dish vs individual bowls) is concrete and tied to the object, not asserted abstractly.