Copyright, Fair Dealing and a School Media Project
A Year 12 student, Tom, is making a 5-minute short film for assessment. He wants to use: (1) 20 seconds of a commercial pop song under the opening credits; (2) a 10-second clip from a famous film shown on a TV in the background of a scene; (3) a photograph from a news website displayed on a character's phone screen. The film will be shown at a school screening (free entry, invited audience) and Tom also wants to upload it to YouTube to enter an online festival. His teacher says 'it's fine because it's for school'. Tom is unsure.
1. Distinguish between the school screening and the YouTube upload in terms of copyright risk, and explain why the teacher's 'it's for school' reasoning is incomplete.
Read the worked answer
Key distinction:
- School screening (free, invited, educational context). Many jurisdictions have limited educational exceptions or fair-dealing provisions that may cover use for assessment or instruction in a closed setting. The risk is lower, but it is not zero, and exceptions are narrow: they typically cover use for the purpose of education, not public performance for entertainment.
- YouTube upload. This is a public communication to a global audience, outside any educational exception. It is the highest-risk use. The platform's Content ID system will likely detect the song and the film clip, leading to muting, blocking or a copyright strike.
Why 'it's for school' is incomplete:
- The exception depends on the purpose and audience, not on the maker's status as a student. Uploading to enter a festival is not a school purpose.
- Even within school, showing a commercial song to an invited audience may exceed a narrow educational exception.
Judgement: Tom should treat the two contexts separately. He can probably rely on a limited exception for the internal screening but must clear or replace the copyrighted material for the public upload.
2. Recommend a practical plan for Tom that preserves his creative intent while managing the copyright risk for both contexts.
Read the worked answer
Plan:
- Replace the pop song with licensed or original music. Use a Creative Commons track with the correct attribution, or ask a music student to compose 20 seconds. This removes the biggest risk (automatic detection) and keeps the opening energy.
- Replace the film clip with an original or public-domain clip. If the TV must show something recognisable, use public-domain footage or a clip the school has licensed. Alternatively, shoot the TV screen showing something Tom made.
- Replace the news photograph with a recreated or licensed image. Tom can mock up a fictional news page, which also avoids implying a real person is involved.
- Keep two versions. An assessment version for the school screening (with any permitted material) and a cleared public version for YouTube. Label them clearly.
- Document permissions. Keep records of licences and attributions in case the festival asks.
Judgement: the exam rewards a solution that is legally cautious and creatively workable. 'Just don't use anything' is safe but unhelpful; 'it's for school' is not a plan. The best answer replaces, licenses, or separates contexts.