A Hung Parliament and the Caretaker Period
A national election produces a lower house of 151 seats. Party X wins 68, Party Y wins 60, and 23 crossbench members are elected. Party X and Party Y both claim a mandate. Party X opens negotiations with the crossbench; Party Y says it will not negotiate until the governor-general acts. The incumbent is Party Y's leader, who remains prime minister. A crossbench member says she will support whichever party commits to a federal integrity commission with teeth. Another says he will support the party that wins the most votes. Counting of postal votes continues for eight days, and three seats remain close.
1. Explain the constitutional position of the incumbent prime minister during this period and what the governor-general may and may not do.
Read the worked answer
The incumbent remains prime minister because the governor-general commissions a government that can command the confidence of the lower house, and the incumbent holds office until resignation or dismissal. The caretaker convention applies: the government should avoid major policy decisions, appointments and contracts that would bind an incoming government, while ordinary administration continues.
Party Y's claim that the governor-general should 'act' is constitutionally weak. The governor-general acts on ministerial advice and does not choose a prime minister by assessing which party has the better program; the test is who can command the confidence of the house. While counting continues and no one can demonstrate a majority, the correct course is to wait.
The governor-general may commission a leader who can show confidence, may refuse a dissolution in limited circumstances, and may dismiss a government that cannot supply or that acts unlawfully. The governor-general should not negotiate with the crossbench, should not invite one party to form government on the basis of vote share alone, and should not act while the electoral result is unresolved. Students should note that 'most votes' is not the constitutional test - confidence on the floor is.
2. The crossbench member's condition is a policy demand. Analyse how this shapes the formation of government.
Read the worked answer
With 68 and 60 seats, neither major party is close to 76. Party X needs 8 crossbench members; Party Y needs 16. That asymmetry gives Party X more bargaining power but also means the crossbench can extract concessions from either side.
A policy demand - an integrity commission with real powers - is a confidence-and-supply condition. If Party X agrees, it can reach 76 and be commissioned. If Party Y refuses, it must find 16 supporters, which is harder. The crossbench member is therefore exercising leverage disproportionate to her single seat, because the numbers are finely balanced.
The judgement is that the crossbench is not a bloc: the second member's condition (support the party with most votes) points to Party X, while the first is issue-based. Students should note that agreements are usually published, that they bind only the signatories, and that a member can withdraw support on a later bill, which is why minority governments are stable only while the agreement holds. The risk to Party X is that the integrity commission becomes a test of its credibility.
3. Three seats remain close and counting continues. Explain why premature action by any actor would be constitutionally risky.
Read the worked answer
The composition of the house is not settled until the count concludes and results are declared. If the governor-general commissioned a leader on incomplete numbers and the final count changed the arithmetic, the commission could rest on a false premise, forcing a second commission or a confidence vote the government might lose.
For the parties, premature claims of mandate can backfire: a public claim that is contradicted by the final result damages credibility and may cost crossbench support. For the crossbench, committing before the numbers are known risks backing the loser and losing influence.
The constitutional principle is that the governor-general acts on demonstrated capacity to command confidence, not on projections. The safe course is to wait for the Australian Electoral Commission to declare results, then for the parties to demonstrate numbers, then for the governor-general to act. Students should also mention the caretaker convention's continued operation during the uncertainty, and that the incumbent's advice to the governor-general must be lawful and consistent with convention.