The Insulated Bottle That Sweated
A small Melbourne studio is developing a reusable 750 mL drink bottle for school students. The body is injection-moulded from a two-layer polypropylene/polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) construction, with the outer shell in opaque polypropylene and an inner liner in clear PETG. Field trials with 40 students over two weeks report that the outer shell becomes slippery when condensation forms, the clear inner liner develops hairline cracks after repeated dishwashing at 65 °C, and the lid thread strips after about 30 open-close cycles. The studio's target retail price is AUD 29, current unit cost is AUD 24 at 5,000 units, and the brief requires a five-year service life and dishwasher-safe cleaning.
1. Identify the material and design failures revealed by the trial data, and explain which are caused by property mismatches rather than user misuse.
Read the worked answer
The hairline cracks in the PETG liner are a property mismatch: PETG has a glass transition temperature around 80 °C but loses dimensional stability and becomes prone to stress cracking under repeated thermal cycling near 65 °C, especially where moulded-in stress remains at corners. This is a material selection failure, not misuse. The slippery outer shell is a surface-property issue: polypropylene has low surface energy and is naturally hydrophobic, so condensation beads rather than wets, and the smooth mould finish offers little grip. A textured or overmoulded elastomer grip would address this. The stripped lid thread is a design failure: thread pitch and engagement depth are too shallow for the torque students apply, and polypropylene creep under load accelerates wear. Thirty cycles is far below a five-year life, so the thread geometry and material need redesign. None of these are primarily user misuse; the brief's dishwasher requirement was known at the outset.
2. Recommend a revised material and construction strategy that meets the brief, and evaluate the trade-offs against the AUD 29 price target.
Read the worked answer
Replace the PETG liner with a single-wall or double-wall food-grade polypropylene or Tritan copolyester inner, or specify stainless steel for the inner vessel. Tritan tolerates dishwasher temperatures and repeated washing better than PETG, and stainless steel gives a genuinely long service life. For the outer shell, use a polypropylene body with a moulded-in textured band or a thermoplastic elastomer overmould at the grip zone. Redesign the lid with a deeper, coarser thread in a tougher grade (for example acetal or glass-filled polypropylene) and specify a silicone gasket rather than relying on thread tension. Trade-offs: Tritan and stainless steel raise unit cost, possibly AUD 3-6 per unit, which breaches the AUD 24 cost ceiling at 5,000 units. Options include reducing wall thickness, negotiating higher volume to spread tooling, or accepting a higher retail price if market research supports it. The studio should prototype two variants and test them through 200 wash cycles and 500 open-close cycles before committing to tooling.