The Model Student Who Cannot Start
Priya, 17, is predicted a high ATAR and is praised constantly for being organised. In the past term she has begun checking and rechecking her timetable for up to two hours nightly, has stopped submitting work she considers imperfect, and has withdrawn from friends to study. She says, 'If I don't get 99, everything I've done is worthless.' She sleeps five hours, eats little, and has lost 3 kg. Her parents say she is 'just a perfectionist' and that pressure is good for her. Her GP notes no physical illness.
1. Distinguish perfectionism from a mental-health concern using specific features of Priya's presentation, and identify the biopsychosocial factors involved.
Read the worked answer
Perfectionism is a trait of high standards; Priya's presentation adds impairment and change from baseline: two hours of checking, work avoidance, social withdrawal, sleep and appetite loss, and weight loss. These suggest a clinical-level concern (e.g., anxiety with compulsive checking, or an emerging eating disorder) that warrants professional assessment, not a label. Biopsychosocial: biological - reduced sleep and food intake, weight loss; psychological - all-or-nothing thinking ('99 or worthless'), fear of failure, compulsive checking that temporarily reduces anxiety (negative reinforcement); social - constant praise for achievement, parental framing of pressure as good, withdrawal from friends removing protective support. The distinction matters because 'just perfectionism' can delay help.
2. Evaluate the parents' claim that pressure is good for Priya, and outline appropriate next steps and supports.
Read the worked answer
Pressure can motivate within limits, but here it is associated with impairment, distress and physical signs, so it is not beneficial. Next steps: GP referral for assessment, school wellbeing/counsellor involvement, and a plan to reduce checking (e.g., time-limited checking with a support person) rather than removing all study. Supports: sleep and eating routine, scheduled social contact, praise for effort rather than rank, and a realistic goal review. A judgement call: the exam rewards not diagnosing Priya but recognising red flags and recommending assessment, while acknowledging her strengths and autonomy.