The Temple Committee and the New Year
A Sinhala Buddhist temple in western Sydney has 140 member families. The committee is planning the Sinhala and Tamil New Year celebration. Two proposals are on the table. Proposal A is a traditional morning programme: almsgiving, observance of precepts, and a short cultural item, ending by noon. Proposal B is an evening event with a DJ, a dance competition, and Sri Lankan street food stalls, running until 10 pm. Younger members support B; many elders support A. The temple's lease requires events to finish by 9 pm and limits amplified music. The committee has a budget of $3,000 and only one weekend available. A local Sinhala language school has asked to run a children's avurudu game stall at whichever event is chosen.
1. Explain how the two proposals reflect different understandings of cultural continuity in a diaspora community.
Read the worked answer
Proposal A treats continuity as fidelity to religious and ritual practice: the New Year is observed through almsgiving and precepts, and culture is transmitted by doing what previous generations did. For elders, the temple's authority rests on this. Proposal B treats continuity as relevance and participation: if young people do not enjoy the event, they will not come, and a culture that is not practised by the young will fade. The DJ and dance competition are not necessarily a rejection of tradition; they are a bid to keep the community visible and attractive. The conflict is therefore not 'traditional versus modern' but two theories of how culture survives. A strong answer notes that both are concerned with continuity, that the lease and budget impose real constraints, and that the language school's game stall could serve either model because avurudu games are traditional but participatory. The answer should avoid assuming elders are simply resistant to change or that young people are indifferent to ritual.
2. Propose a feasible compromise and explain how it addresses the constraints and the interests of both groups.
Read the worked answer
A workable compromise is a two-part day. The morning keeps Proposal A's core: almsgiving, precepts, and a brief cultural item, with the language school's avurudu game stall running afterwards for children. The evening becomes a shorter cultural night, ending by 8:30 pm to respect the 9 pm lease limit, with amplified music kept low and a dance item framed as a cultural performance rather than a club-style DJ set. The $3,000 budget is split: modest food and game prizes for the morning, and a small sound system for the evening, with families contributing dishes to reduce cost. This addresses the lease (finish before 9 pm, controlled amplification), the budget (shared catering), the elders' interest (ritual is not displaced), and the young people's interest (a social evening still happens). The language school gains a slot either way. The answer should explain the trade-offs: the evening is shorter and less lavish than Proposal B, and the morning requires volunteer effort. Simply choosing one proposal does not answer the question, which asks for a compromise.