The Interpreter Who Wasn't Called
Daniel works at a family services agency. A referral arrives for Linh, a 41-year-old woman who migrated eight months ago and speaks limited English. She attends with her 14-year-old son, Bao, who translates for her. Linh is seeking help after leaving a violent partner and needs to discuss housing options and a protection order. Bao is quiet and looks at the floor when his mother describes the violence. The appointment is 30 minutes, the agency has a telephone interpreter service with a 20-minute wait, and Daniel's next client is booked immediately after. Linh says through Bao, 'It's fine, he knows everything anyway.'
1. Should Daniel proceed with Bao interpreting? Justify your answer using communication and confidentiality principles.
Read the worked answer
Daniel should not rely on Bao as the interpreter for this conversation.
Reasons: (1) Accuracy - a 14-year-old is unlikely to convey legal and housing terminology accurately, and may soften or omit details, especially about violence. (2) Confidentiality - Linh has a right to control who knows her information; Bao is a child in the family, not a neutral party, and the disclosures may distress or endanger him. (3) Role conflict - Bao would be placed in the position of speaking for his mother and possibly being asked to make adult decisions. (4) Consent quality - Linh's 'consent' may reflect politeness or a wish not to inconvenience staff rather than genuine informed agreement. (5) Child safety - hearing detailed accounts of violence against his mother is a potential harm to Bao.
What Daniel should do: Acknowledge Linh's preference warmly, explain that using a professional interpreter protects her privacy and gives her the most accurate information, and offer the telephone interpreter even if it means a short wait. He can use the wait to check Bao is comfortable and offer him a separate space, and can rebook or shorten the next appointment. If Linh still refuses, Daniel should document the refusal, keep the conversation to low-sensitivity matters, and arrange a follow-up with an interpreter. Family members, and especially children, should only interpret in genuine emergencies or for trivial matters.
2. Describe how Daniel should structure the session to communicate respectfully with Linh, including what he should do about Bao.
Read the worked answer
Before the session: Brief the interpreter on the purpose, expected length, and the need for first-person, word-for-word interpreting. Confirm the interpreter speaks Linh's language and dialect.
Opening: Greet Linh directly, not Bao, and maintain eye contact with her. Explain the interpreter's role and that everything is confidential and will not be shared with her partner. Explain limits to confidentiality, including risk of serious harm and mandatory reporting, in plain language.
During: Speak in short segments, pause for interpretation, and avoid jargon. Check understanding with open questions such as 'Can you tell me what you understood about the housing options?' rather than 'Do you understand?' Watch for non-verbal cues and allow silence. Ask Linh directly about her safety and any immediate risks.
Bao: Arrange for Bao to wait in a supervised area or another room, framed positively: 'This is grown-up business and you've been really helpful; you can wait here.' Offer him a support referral if he seems distressed. Do not ask him to confirm or correct anything his mother said.
Closing: Summarise the agreed actions in simple language, offer written information in Linh's language, and confirm how she can contact Daniel safely, including whether phone calls or letters are safe at home. Document the use of the interpreter and any concerns about Bao.