The Social Campaign That Missed Its Audience
A small agency has built a three-week social media campaign for a youth arts festival. The target audience is 16-24 year olds. The campaign uses static poster images posted on the festival's Facebook page, with captions written in a formal tone. After week one, reach is low, engagement is under 1%, and most views are from users over 45. The client is unhappy and wants to 'boost the posts with paid promotion' immediately. The agency has a small budget of $600 for the remaining two weeks and one designer available part-time. The festival's brand uses a bold, playful visual style that the static posters do not reflect. The agency must decide whether to spend the budget on promotion or on new content.
1. Diagnose why the campaign is underperforming and recommend where to spend the $600.
Read the worked answer
The symptoms point to a content-audience mismatch rather than a reach problem. The audience is 16-24, but the campaign uses static posters, a formal tone, and a platform where that age group is less active; the over-45 skew confirms the content is reaching the wrong people. Boosting the existing posts would pay to show weak content to the wrong audience, so promotion alone is unlikely to fix engagement. The agency should spend most of the budget on new content: short vertical video, creator-style or behind-the-scenes clips, and captions in a casual tone that matches the festival's playful brand. A smaller portion, perhaps $150-$200, can go to targeted promotion of the best-performing new asset, aimed at 16-24 year olds in the festival's region. The designer should produce a small batch of assets quickly and test them, then promote only what performs. Measurement should track saves, shares, and profile visits, not just reach.
2. The client insists on boosting the existing posts. How should the agency respond while maintaining the relationship?
Read the worked answer
The agency should acknowledge the client's urgency and explain the evidence clearly, without being defensive. A short written summary should show the audience skew, the engagement rate, and a comparison of what similar audiences respond to, then propose a test: run a small paid boost on the existing posts alongside new content for a few days, and compare results. This respects the client's request while protecting the budget from being spent entirely on weak content. The agency should agree on a decision date and success metrics in advance, so the comparison is fair. If the client still insists after the test, the agency should document the recommendation and follow the client's instruction, while noting the likely outcome. Clear roles help: the client owns the brand and budget, the agency owns the recommendation. The relationship survives because the agency is seen as honest and collaborative, not obstructive.