WACE ATAR English as an Additional Language or Dialect study materials
WACE ATAR English as an Additional Language or Dialect study resources

WACE ATAR English as an Additional Language or Dialect: Responding Analytically and Persuasively

WACE ATAR English as an Additional Language or Dialect · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Responding Analytically and Persuasively

Two modes, two logics

An analytical response explains how a text works; a persuasive response argues a position. Both need a clear thesis, ordered paragraphs, evidence and a conclusion that does more than repeat the introduction.

Analytical responses

Build a thesis that answers the question's exact terms. Each body paragraph should make one claim, support it with a short quotation or described textual feature, analyse the effect, and link back to the thesis. Avoid retelling the plot; the marker already knows the text. Use analytical verbs - positions, constructs, foregrounds, undermines, invites, challenges - rather than shows or talks about.

Persuasive responses

Establish a stance in the opening, then use a deliberate progression of arguments, each with evidence (statistics, examples, expert views, anecdote). Anticipate and rebut the strongest counterargument; this demonstrates control. Rhetorical devices - tricolon, rhetorical questions, inclusive 'we', concession - should serve the argument, not decorate it. A concession sentence ('While cost is a genuine concern, …') followed by a rebuttal is highly effective.

Concepts to master

  • Thesis versus topic; every paragraph must advance the thesis.
  • Concession and rebuttal; distinguishing assertion from evidence.
  • Cohesive devices: signposting, topic sentences, transitions, pronoun reference.
  • Audience positioning and register consistency.
  • The difference between describing a technique and evaluating its effectiveness.

Traps

Ignoring part of a two-part question; writing feature-spotting instead of argument; unsupported generalisations in persuasive writing; shifting between first and third person randomly; and conclusions that introduce new evidence.

Worked example (persuasive): Thesis: 'School start times should be delayed because adolescent sleep cycles are biologically shifted.' Paragraph: claim → evidence (sleep research) → concession ('Opponents cite transport costs') → rebuttal ('staggered bus schedules absorb this') → link.