The Scholarship Letter and the Honourific Trap
You are given a Hindi letter of about 220 words written by a school principal to a former student, now 24, who has won a regional scholarship. The letter opens with 'प्रिय वत्स,' and throughout uses 'आप' but also 'तुम' in two places: once when recalling the student's childhood ('जब तुम छोटे थे') and once in a closing blessing ('तुम सदा सफल हो'). The letter also uses 'श्रीमती' for the student's mother and 'स्नेहाशीष' in the sign-off. A question asks you to explain how the relationship between writer and reader is constructed, and another asks whether the register is consistent. You have 40 minutes and must cite the text.
1. Explain how the shifts between 'आप' and 'तुम' construct the relationship between the principal and the former student.
Read the worked answer
The key move is to see that the shifts are not errors but deliberate positioning. 'आप' frames the adult, public relationship: the student as a scholarship recipient and an equal-ish adult addressed with formal respect. The two 'तुम' uses are both anchored in intimacy and memory: 'जब तुम छोटे थे' recalls the child the principal once knew, and 'तुम सदा सफल हो' is a blessing, where the affection of an elder overrides formal distance. A strong answer notes that the effect is layered rather than inconsistent: the principal simultaneously speaks as an institutional figure and as a former guardian-figure, and the 'तुम' moments mark where the personal voice breaks through. You should quote both instances and comment on the closing blessing as the emotional climax, where the shift to 'तुम' signals warmth rather than disrespect.
2. A classmate claims the register is 'inconsistent and therefore flawed'. Evaluate this claim using evidence from the letter.
Read the worked answer
The claim confuses consistency with coherence. Register in Hindi letters can be mixed when the writer occupies two roles, and here the mixture is signposted: 'प्रिय वत्स' is an affectionate, elder-to-younger opening, 'आप' carries the formal body, and 'स्नेहाशीष' in the sign-off openly declares affection. So the shifts are motivated by the relationship, not by carelessness. A good evaluation concedes the surface inconsistency but argues that it produces a richer persona. It should also note that 'तुम' in a blessing is conventional and carries no disrespect, whereas 'तुम' in a formal request would. The strongest answers distinguish between a register that is uncontrolled and one that is strategically mixed, and they cite the exact phrases rather than generalising.