WACE Indonesian Second Language study materials
WACE Indonesian Second Language study resources

Choosing Between Two Oral Topics

WACE Indonesian Second Language · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Choosing Between Two Oral Topics

A student preparing for the practical oral examination has two possible discussion topics. Topic A is 'My hobby: playing badminton', which the student knows very well and can describe in detail, including equipment, training schedule, and a recent tournament. Topic B is 'Technology and young people', which the student finds harder but which allows comparison, opinion, and speculation about the future. The student's vocabulary is strongest for concrete description and weakest for abstract opinion. The examiner's questions will probe whatever topic the student chooses, and the student must sustain about 5 minutes of discussion. The student has one week to prepare and can rehearse with a teacher once.

1. Which topic should the student choose, and what is the reasoning? Consider both linguistic evidence and exam conditions.

Read the worked answer

The stronger choice is Topic B, with preparation, though the decision is close and depends on how the student uses the week.

Arguments for Topic A:

  • The student has rich, accurate vocabulary and concrete details, which supports fluency and accuracy.
  • Familiar content reduces the risk of freezing.

Arguments for Topic B:

  • A 5-minute discussion requires sustained development, comparison, opinion, and speculation. Topic A invites description, which runs out quickly and gives narrow evidence of range. Topic B naturally generates the functions the examiner needs to hear.
  • The student's weakness (abstract opinion) is exactly what the exam rewards; choosing the easy topic avoids demonstrating the higher-level functions.

The judgement: choose Topic B, but prepare it with concrete anchors (examples, personal experience) so the student can move between concrete and abstract language. The one teacher rehearsal should be used to practise opinion and comparison frames, not to rehearse a script. If after rehearsal the student still cannot sustain 5 minutes on B, switching to A is a defensible fallback, but A should be prepared to include opinion, not only description.

2. How should the student use the single teacher rehearsal to test the decision?

Read the worked answer

The rehearsal should be treated as a diagnostic, not a performance. The student should:

  1. Ask the teacher to run a full 5-minute discussion on Topic B with unpredictable follow-ups.
  2. Note where the student stalls, switches to English, or gives one-word answers - these are the failure points.
  3. Check whether the student can move from a concrete example to an opinion and back, which is the skill Topic B demands.
  4. Ask the teacher for specific feedback on range (functions used) and interaction (turn-taking), not just grammar.

Decision rule: if the student can sustain 5 minutes with only minor stalls, commit to B. If the student collapses into description or silence, use the remaining days to build B's opinion frames, and only fall back to A if time runs out. The point is to make the choice on evidence from a realistic rehearsal, not on comfort alone.