Choosing between ਤੂੰ and ਤੁਸੀਂ in a formal letter
Jaskaran is writing a formal letter in Punjabi to the principal of his school in Bunbury, requesting permission to hold a Punjabi poetry lunchtime event. He drafts the opening with 'ਤੂੰ' forms because his family uses them with familiar adults, and he closes with 'ਤੇਰਾ ਵਿਦਿਆਰਥੀ' (your student). His teacher says the grammar is fine but the letter 'sounds wrong'. He must also refer to a teacher, Mr Gill, in the third person, and to the principal in the second person throughout. He has 150 words for the body and must include the date, the requested room, and the number of students involved (35).
1. Explain the pronoun problem in Jaskaran's draft and give the corrected closing.
Read the worked answer
Punjabi distinguishes intimate/familiar 'ਤੂੰ' from respectful 'ਤੁਸੀਂ'. In a formal letter to a principal, 'ਤੁਸੀਂ' and its verb agreement are required; 'ਤੂੰ' reads as addressing a social inferior or a close friend, which is inappropriate in this relationship. The verb forms must agree: 'ਤੁਸੀਂ ਕਰੋ' rather than 'ਤੂੰ ਕਰ'.
The closing 'ਤੇਰਾ ਵਿਦਿਆਰਥੀ' should become 'ਤੁਹਾਡਾ ਵਿਦਿਆਰਥੀ' (your student). If he wants extra formality he can write 'ਆਪ ਜੀ ਦਾ ਵਿਦਿਆਰਥੀ'. The third-person reference to Mr Gill is unaffected: 'ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗਿੱਲ ਜੀ' takes third-person agreement, and the principal stays second person throughout. The key judgement is that pronoun choice is a social decision, not a grammatical error, so the correction is about register consistency across the whole letter, including the closing formula.
2. Jaskaran's family uses 'ਤੂੰ' with an uncle he respects. Does that justify using it with the principal? Justify your answer with reference to how address terms work.
Read the worked answer
No. Address terms encode the relationship, not the speaker's general respectfulness. 'ਤੂੰ' with a close uncle signals intimacy and is compatible with affection; the same form with a principal signals either intimacy that does not exist or condescension. The relevant variables are relative status, social distance, and formality of the genre. A formal written request maximises distance and formality, so 'ਤੁਸੀਂ' is required.
The uncle example shows that 'ਤੂੰ' is not inherently rude; it is relationally marked. Jaskaran's error is transferring a family norm into an institutional genre without adjusting for the changed variables. The correct reasoning is to identify the three variables and apply them, not to memorise a rule that 'ਤੂੰ' is always rude. This is why the teacher said the grammar was fine but the letter sounded wrong.