TTIPAB Trade Marks Attorney study materials
TTIPAB Trade Marks Attorney study resources

TTIPAB Trade Marks Attorney: Trade Mark Practice and Procedure Before the Registrar

TTIPAB Trade Marks Attorney · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Trade Mark Practice and Procedure Before the Registrar

Filing and prosecution

Know the lifecycle of an application: filing, formalities examination, substantive examination, publication, opposition period, registration, and renewal. Candidates must understand the requirements for a filing date (request, applicant details, representation of the mark, list of goods and services, and fees), the rules on priority claims, and the consequences of missing deadlines. Traps include confusing the priority period (six months under the Paris Convention) with the opposition period, and assuming that a request for an extension of time is automatically granted.

Office actions and responses

When an examiner raises objections, the applicant may argue, amend the specification, submit evidence of acquired distinctiveness, or divide the application. Understand the difference between a divisional application and a continuation, and how division affects the priority date. Remember that amendments to the mark itself are generally not permitted if they would alter the identity of the mark, whereas amendments to the goods and services list are common.

Registration and maintenance

Registration confers an exclusive right for ten years, renewable indefinitely. Know the rules on revocation for non-use (usually a five-year continuous period), the grace period, and the requirement for genuine use. Traps include assuming that token use suffices, or that use on related goods counts for the registered goods.

Worked example

An applicant receives an objection that the mark is descriptive. The strongest response is usually evidence of extensive use and advertising before the filing date, showing that the relevant public now associates the sign with the applicant. Rule of thumb: argue law first, amend second, and submit evidence last, because evidence is costly and time-limited.