Dismissal After a Workplace Injury and the Burden of Proof
M worked as a welder for a private firm for six years under a fixed-term contract renewed annually. In January he suffered a back injury at work; his doctor ordered 30 days' light duty. The employer reassigned him to heavy lifting, he objected in writing, and two weeks later he was dismissed for 'redundancy.' A younger worker was hired into M's exact role three days after the dismissal. M's average monthly wage was 900 AZN. The employer says the dismissal was lawful because the contract was fixed-term and about to expire. M wants to challenge the dismissal and obtain compensation.
1. What legal issues does M's dismissal raise, and what must M establish?
Read the worked answer
M should argue that the stated reason (redundancy) is pretextual and that the real reason was his injury and objection to unsafe reassignment, which would make the dismissal unlawful. Key facts supporting M: the timing, the immediate replacement hire, the written objection, and the medical restriction. M must establish the employment relationship, the dismissal, and facts suggesting the prohibited ground; the employer then bears the burden of proving a genuine and lawful reason. The fixed-term nature of the contract does not by itself authorize dismissal during its term, and successive renewals may affect how the relationship is characterized.
2. What remedies and amounts should M pursue?
Read the worked answer
M should seek a declaration that the dismissal was unlawful, reinstatement or, if he prefers, compensation for forced absence and severance. Compensation is commonly calculated by reference to the average monthly wage and the period of forced absence, subject to statutory caps and the actual period out of work. M should also claim unpaid amounts for the light-duty period and any workplace injury compensation separately. M should file within the applicable limitation period and gather the contract renewals, medical certificate, written objection, and evidence of the replacement hire.
3. How should M's advocate frame the evidence strategy?
Read the worked answer
The advocate should request the employer's hiring records and the redundancy documentation, including whether the position genuinely disappeared. Witness statements from co-workers about the reassignment and the new hire are important. The advocate should present a chronology linking the injury, the objection, and the dismissal, and should prepare M for cross-examination on the fixed-term contract. Documentary evidence of the wage is needed to quantify the claim.