The Invoice Dated Before the Storm
An April 2 windstorm is claimed as the cause of a full roof replacement on a 2004 Goodyear home. The claim is reported April 21 by a roofing company, not the insured. The $34,800 invoice is dated April 1, uses two different typefaces, and lists code upgrades that do not appear in the itemized estimate. Submitted photos show uniform granule loss on every slope, no torn or creased shingles, and no debris in the yard or the neighbor's pool. The insured filed a $9,800 roof repair claim 16 months ago for the same slope. The contractor tells the adjuster that if the claim is approved he will take care of the $3,000 deductible and asks the adjuster to use his photos instead of inspecting the attic. The insured says she simply wants a new roof before monsoon season.
1. Identify the red flags, rank them by significance, and explain what each one actually indicates.
Read the worked answer
1. Invoice dated before the loss. An invoice for storm repairs dated the day before the storm is the single most serious indicator. Either the document was created or altered after the fact, or the work was scheduled before the event. Either way, the estimate is no longer a neutral scope document.
2. Uniform granule loss with no mechanical damage. Wind damage produces creased, lifted, or missing shingles, and collateral marks such as dented gutters or displaced ridge caps. Every-slope granule loss with no debris is the classic signature of age and normal weathering, not a wind event.
3. A prior paid claim on the same slope. Sixteen months ago the insured collected $9,800 for that slope. Either the prior repair was never done, or the damage is cumulative and wear-related. Both facts matter.
4. The contractor, not the insured, is reporting the claim, and is the sole source of the photos and the estimate. That is a manufactured-evidence pattern.
5. The deductible offer. A promise to absorb the insured's $3,000 deductible is a rebate arrangement. It is improper in Arizona, and it also means the invoice either will not be performed as written or contains padding.
6. Two typefaces and unmatched line items. Suggests post-hoc editing. Preserve the document as received.
7. The request to skip the attic. An instruction to avoid an inspection is an instruction to avoid evidence.
2. Set out the investigation steps in order, including SIU involvement, and state what the adjuster may not do.
Read the worked answer
Preserve first. Do not return, alter, or re-save the invoice. Save the original email with headers, the photos with metadata, and the call notes. Note the exact time and content of the deductible comment in a contemporaneous log.
Refer to SIU the same day. Do not wait for a completed inspection. SIU referral decisions rest on the pattern, and the pattern is already present.
Do the inspection personally. Walk the roof, photograph the slopes, look for creases, check gutters and downspouts for collateral damage, and inspect the attic. If the contractor objects, that goes in the log.
Pull the prior claim. Scope, photos, payment, and whether the repair was actually completed. Compare the damaged slope and the shingle appearance.
Get a second opinion. Retain an independent roof consultant or engineer. On a $34,800 claim, a few hundred dollars buys the opinion that supports the decision.
Check the weather. Confirm a recorded wind event at the location on April 2 with gusts against the shingle's rated threshold.
What the adjuster may not do: accuse the insured of fraud, discuss fraud with the contractor, promise prosecution or no prosecution, delay the claim indefinitely while treating suspicion as a denial, or deny solely because a document looks odd. Suspicion triggers investigation, not a coverage decision.
3. How should the adjuster communicate with the insured about the deductible offer and the current state of the claim?
Read the worked answer
The insured should hear the important parts from the adjuster, not from the contractor.
Explain the deductible plainly. The $3,000 deductible is the insured's responsibility under the policy; it cannot be absorbed, rebated, or financed through an inflated invoice. Say it once, in writing, without lecturing. If the contractor offers to absorb it, ask the insured to let the carrier know, and do not repeat the contractor's statement back to her as an accusation.
Be honest about the status. Say that the claim is still under investigation, that a roof consultant and an attic inspection are needed, and give a realistic timetable. Do not preview a denial, and do not imply the claim will be paid.
Avoid accusation language. Words like fraud, scam, or staging in a letter to an insured convert a coverage decision into a defamation and bad-faith problem. The correct phrasing is that the carrier needs to confirm the cause and date of the damage.
Document the policy duties. Remind her of her duty to cooperate and to submit accurate records, but keep the tone service-oriented. If the inspection ultimately shows only age-related wear, issue a written denial citing the exclusion and offer to review any contractor report she obtains. Fair, careful, documented handling protects the carrier whether the claim is paid, denied, or referred.