AZ MPJE study materials
AZ MPJE study resources

Verbal Order, CII e-Prescribing Failure, and the Emergency Oral Exception

AZ MPJE · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Verbal Order, CII e-Prescribing Failure, and the Emergency Oral Exception

A rural Arizona pharmacy's computer system goes down at 4:45 p.m. Friday. A nurse practitioner at the clinic next door calls in a prescription for a Schedule II opioid, 20 tablets, for a patient with a fractured wrist, stating the clinic's e-prescribing system is also offline and the patient is in pain. The pharmacist has never dispensed to this patient before and cannot reach the prescriber's supervising physician. The pharmacy's DEA registration is current. The pharmacist is unsure whether an oral Schedule II is permitted, what must be documented, and how long the pharmacy has to obtain a written prescription. The patient arrives 20 minutes later expecting to leave with medication.

1. Determine whether the pharmacist may dispense the Schedule II opioid on an oral order and what conditions apply.

Read the worked answer

An oral Schedule II prescription is permitted only in a genuine emergency. The emergency exception requires that the prescribing practitioner make a good-faith determination that immediate administration is necessary, that no appropriate alternative treatment is available, and that it is not reasonably possible for the prescriber to provide a written prescription before dispensing. The quantity is limited to the amount needed to treat the emergency period.

Here the facts support the exception: an acute fracture with pain, both the clinic's and the pharmacy's systems offline, and a prescriber who is directly involved. The pharmacist should confirm each element with the prescriber on the recorded call - the nature of the emergency, the lack of alternatives, the reason a written prescription cannot be provided first, and the quantity needed for the emergency period. A 20-tablet supply for a fracture is plausible but the pharmacist should confirm the quantity is limited to the emergency period rather than a routine supply.

The pharmacist must reduce the oral order to writing immediately, including the prescriber's name and DEA number, the drug, strength, quantity, directions, date, and the pharmacist's notation that the order was given orally in an emergency. The pharmacist should not dispense on the oral order if any element is missing or if the prescriber cannot be reached to confirm.

2. What follow-up documentation must the prescriber provide, and by when?

Read the worked answer

For an emergency oral Schedule II order, the prescriber must deliver a written prescription to the dispensing pharmacy within 7 days. The pharmacy must retain that written prescription with the record of the oral order. If the written prescription is not received within 7 days, the pharmacist must notify DEA.

The pharmacist should calendar the deadline, note the date of the oral order, and document the follow-up contact with the clinic. If the clinic's systems remain down, the pharmacist should ask the prescriber to hand-deliver or mail a written prescription rather than wait. The written prescription must match the oral order; a discrepancy is a red flag that requires resolution before the record is closed.

The pharmacy's obligation does not end with dispensing. The file must show the oral order, the emergency determination, the dispensing record, and the follow-up written prescription, so that an inspector can reconstruct the sequence.

3. The patient is new to the pharmacy and asks why the pharmacist is calling the prescriber again. How should the pharmacist handle the conversation and what red flags should be assessed?

Read the worked answer

The pharmacist should explain plainly that a Schedule II medication given by phone requires an extra confirmation step and that this protects the patient. The pharmacist should not suggest suspicion of the patient.

The clinical and compliance red flags to assess: a new patient with no dispensing history at this pharmacy; a prescriber the pharmacy has not verified; a Schedule II ordered orally during a system outage; a quantity that may exceed the emergency period; and any pressure to dispense before confirmation. The pharmacist should verify the prescriber's DEA registration and that the prescriber is authorized to prescribe the drug, confirm the patient's identity with a photo ID, and check the state prescription monitoring program before dispensing. If the monitoring report shows recent overlapping opioid prescriptions from other prescribers, the pharmacist should resolve that with the prescriber before dispensing.

The pharmacist should document the verification steps and the counseling provided, including warning signs, storage, and disposal. Refusing to dispense without confirmation is appropriate and is not abandonment; the pharmacist should offer to contact the clinic again or direct the patient to urgent care if the order cannot be verified.