The Custody File
A 15-year-old soccer player is brought to an Arizona clinic by her stepfather for a lateral ankle sprain. The mother is out of town; the stepfather is not her legal guardian and says the mother "will sign anything later." The girl is treated for two visits. On the third day the biological father calls. He shares joint legal custody, was not told about the injury, and demands the full record, adding that the note should say the injury happened at school rather than at his ex-wife's house because "the insurance will be cleaner that way." Later that week the stepfather asks the PT to keep treating the girl but to bill the visits as "gait training" so the mother's plan will pay, and mentions the girl has been limping more since a fall at home that no one witnessed.
1. Was consent to treat valid at the first two visits, and how should the clinic handle the third?
Read the worked answer
Probably not valid - and that is a correctable problem, not a paperwork detail.
- Consent for a minor's care must come from a parent or legal guardian, or from someone with written authority. A stepfather without guardianship and without a signed authorization from the mother is not that person. "She'll sign later" is consent after the fact, if it ever arrives.
- The clinic should have verified authority at intake; having failed that, it should: obtain the mother's written consent (and confirm her authority) before further treatment, document who consented and how authority was verified, and note the stepfather's role as escort only.
- The father's joint legal custody matters for information, and possibly for consent depending on the custody order. Ask for the order rather than guessing who wins the phone call.
- Clinical overlay: the report of increased limping after an unwitnessed fall in a minor changes the picture. Reassess before the next treatment, and if the mechanism or findings suggest occult injury, refer for imaging rather than treat through it.
2. How should the records request be handled, and what is the response to the request to alter the mechanism of injury?
Read the worked answer
One answer is a process; the other is a hard no.
Records:
- The record belongs to the clinic; the patient/parents have a right of access through a proper authorization that meets Arizona and federal requirements.
- With joint legal custody, a parent generally has access to the child's health information absent a court order limiting it. The clinic should request the custody order, verify the requester's identity, and release in accordance with it - documenting the basis. It should not referee the parents or disclose the mother's travel or contact information.
Mechanism of injury:
- Never. The mechanism, the history as reported, and who reported it are clinical facts. Changing them to fit an insurance narrative is falsification of the record, and it may also be insurance fraud if a claim relies on it.
- The correct response is a single sentence, in writing if needed: the record documents what was reported and observed, and it will not be altered.
- If the father believes the history was reported inaccurately, the remedy is an addendum or a patient-supplied statement in the chart - labeled as such - not an edit to someone else's entry.
3. What are the obligations around the request to rebill as "gait training" and the possible unwitnessed injury?
Read the worked answer
Billing integrity and clinical duty, treated separately.
Billing:
- Codes must reflect the services actually delivered. Relabeling ankle rehabilitation as gait training to obtain coverage is misrepresentation, and submitting it is fraud exposure for the therapist and the clinic. The payer's decision does not change what was done.
- The proper path when coverage is denied: appeal with clinical documentation, offer a cash-pay option with clear disclosure, or modify the plan to what the patient can afford. Never substitute a code.
Clinical duty:
- New or worsening limp following an unwitnessed fall is a change in status requiring reassessment, not another visit at the same plan. Consider imaging referral and, depending on the findings and the family situation, follow the clinic's protocol for concerning injuries in a minor.
- Both requests - the code swap and the "just keep treating" - come from the same place: pressure to keep the episode open. The therapist's answer to both is the same: the record and the plan follow the patient, not the payer or the family's preferences. Put the refusal and the reasoning in the chart, and notify the custodial parent of the plan change.