Writing the Report After a Use of Force
You responded to a domestic disturbance call at 23:10. A man was yelling in a driveway and refused repeated commands to show his hands. You and a second trooper took him to the ground and handcuffed him. He has a scrape on his forehead and complains of shoulder pain. An ambulance is called. Your sergeant asks for the report within the hour. You have: your body camera footage, a brief note that says "subject resistive, takedown, medics," and the second trooper's verbal account. The man's family says he was pushed into a car.
1. List the elements the report must contain to be defensible, and explain why each matters.
Read the worked answer
The report needs, at minimum: the time and location; the reason for the call; the commands given and how many times; the subject's specific actions that justified force, described in observable terms rather than labels; the type of force used and by whom; the subject's injuries and when they were observed; the medical response and timing; witness identities and statements; and any evidence that contradicts your account, including the family's claim.
Each element serves a purpose. Specific commands and actions let a reviewer test whether force was proportional. Observable descriptions - "clenched fists, stepped forward" rather than "aggressive" - are what a court can evaluate; labels are conclusions. Injury documentation and medical timing rebut later claims that care was delayed. Recording the family's version, even though it conflicts with yours, shows the investigation was complete and prevents the appearance that contrary evidence was hidden. The body camera footage should be referenced by time stamp so the report and video can be checked against each other.
2. The family says he was pushed into a car, which conflicts with your account. How should the report handle that conflict?
Read the worked answer
State the claim plainly, attribute it to the person who made it, and describe what the evidence shows. Do not omit it and do not editorialize. For example: "The subject's brother stated that troopers pushed the subject into a vehicle. Body camera footage from 23:12:40 shows the subject moving forward toward Trooper B before the takedown; no push into a vehicle is visible in the footage. The vehicle was approximately six feet behind the subject." That format gives the reviewer the claim, the source, the evidence, and the conclusion, in that order.
If the footage is unclear or does not fully resolve the claim, say so and flag it for supervisory review rather than declaring yourself cleared. A report that acknowledges an unresolved conflict is more credible than one that claims certainty it does not have. The goal is a record that a neutral reviewer can trust, not a record that wins an argument.