BCPS study materials
BCPS study resources

Insulin Mix-Up, Barcode Overrides, and a Safety Corrective Action Plan

BCPS · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Insulin Mix-Up, Barcode Overrides, and a Safety Corrective Action Plan

A 340-bed community hospital reports three incidents in six months in which a patient received insulin glargine instead of insulin lispro at mealtime. In each case, the nurse overrode a barcode scanning alert because the patient's armband would not scan and the unit was busy. One patient developed hypoglycemia (glucose 42 mg/dL) and was treated with dextrose. The pharmacy stores both products in the same refrigerator bin labeled 'insulin.' The hospital's incident reporting rate is low, and staff say reports 'don't go anywhere.' Leadership asks for a corrective action plan.

1. Identify the system failures and explain why blaming the nurses is insufficient.

Read the worked answer

The events reflect system failures, not isolated individual carelessness:

  • Storage: long-acting and rapid-acting insulins are co-located in one unlabeled bin, creating look-alike/sound-alike risk.
  • Technology: armband scanning failures force workarounds; override capability is not tightly controlled or reviewed.
  • Workflow: understaffing and time pressure encourage bypassing safety checks.
  • Reporting culture: low reporting and staff belief that reports 'don't go anywhere' indicate weak feedback and psychological safety.
  • Verification: no independent double-check or distinct labeling at administration.

Blaming individuals would miss the conditions that make the error likely to recur. A just culture approach distinguishes system-induced error from reckless behavior while still holding staff accountable for knowingly bypassing safeguards.

2. Propose specific corrective actions using a hierarchy of effectiveness.

Read the worked answer

Prioritize interventions by strength:

Elimination/substitution (strongest):

  • Store rapid-acting and long-acting insulins in physically separate, clearly differentiated bins in the refrigerator and pharmacy.
  • Use tall-man lettering and distinct-colored labels (for example, insulin LISPRO vs insulin glargine) and auxiliary warning labels.

Engineering/technology:

  • Fix armband printing/scanning failures and provide a standardized backup process requiring independent verification when scanning is impossible.
  • Require a structured reason for every barcode override and generate a daily override report for pharmacist/nurse review.
  • Configure the EHR to display insulin onset/duration and to require mealtime glucose confirmation.

Administrative/education:

  • Educate staff on insulin types, timing, and the override policy.
  • Add a daily safety huddle and a nonpunitive reporting feedback loop.
  • Audit compliance with scanning and storage separation.

3. Which metrics would you monitor to determine whether the plan is working?

Read the worked answer

Use a balanced set of process and outcome measures displayed on run charts or statistical process control charts:

  • Outcome: wrong-insulin events per 10,000 insulin doses; severe hypoglycemia events (glucose <40 mg/dL) per 1,000 patient-days.
  • Process: percentage of insulin doses scanned correctly; barcode override rate; armband scan failure rate; percentage of override reasons documented.
  • Culture: incident reports per month (an initial increase can be a good sign of improved reporting); staff survey on safety and feedback.
  • Audit: storage separation compliance and tall-man labeling compliance.

Review monthly with pharmacy, nursing, and quality leadership, and revise the plan if process measures improve but wrong-drug events persist.