BCS Written Botany study materials
BCS Written Botany study resources

Postharvest Spoilage of Tomatoes: A Case of Fungal and Bacterial Interaction

BCS Written Botany · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Postharvest Spoilage of Tomatoes: A Case of Fungal and Bacterial Interaction

A tomato packing house in Gazipur, Bangladesh, reports 30% postharvest loss within 5 days of harvest. Symptoms: water-soaked lesions with white mycelium and black spore masses on the stem end, and soft, foul-smelling rot on the sides. The tomatoes are harvested at the breaker stage, washed in chlorinated water (100 ppm), and stored in crates at 25–30°C and 80–90% RH. No pre-cooling is done. You isolate fungi from lesions and obtain two genera: Alternaria and Rhizopus. You also isolate a bacterium that tests Gram-negative, oxidase-negative, and ferments glucose. Koch's postulates for the fungus are fulfilled, but the bacterium alone does not cause rot when inoculated on healthy fruit. However, when co-inoculated with Rhizopus, rot severity doubles.

1. Identify the likely pathogens and explain the interaction. What is the role of the bacterium?

Read the worked answer

The symptoms suggest a mixed infection. Alternaria likely causes the black spore masses and stem-end lesions, while Rhizopus causes the soft, watery rot with white mycelium and black sporangia. The bacterium, being Gram-negative, oxidase-negative, and glucose-fermenting, is consistent with a soft-rot Enterobacteriaceae such as Pectobacterium or Dickeya. Since the bacterium alone does not cause rot, it is not a primary pathogen but an opportunistic colonizer. When co-inoculated with Rhizopus, the fungus may produce pectinases that degrade tissue, releasing nutrients that the bacterium uses, or the bacterium may produce enzymes that enhance fungal invasion. The bacterium could also lower pH or produce plant hormones that weaken defenses. The interaction is synergistic. The high storage temperature and lack of pre-cooling favor both fungal growth and bacterial multiplication. The chlorine wash may be ineffective because it does not penetrate wounds and is neutralized by organic matter.

2. Recommend a postharvest management plan to reduce losses to below 10%, justifying each step with the biology of the pathogens.

Read the worked answer
  1. Pre-cooling: immediately after harvest, force-air cool to 12–15°C within 2 hours. This slows Rhizopus growth (optimal 25–30°C) and bacterial multiplication. 2. Sanitation: use clean crates, and replace chlorine with peracetic acid (200 ppm) or hot water (50°C for 2 min) to reduce inoculum and remove organic matter. 3. Handling: minimize wounds during harvest and transport, as both pathogens enter through wounds. 4. Storage: maintain 12–15°C and 90–95% RH to reduce water loss but avoid free moisture that favors bacteria. 5. Biological control: apply antagonistic yeast (e.g., Candida oleophila) or Bacillus subtilis to compete with pathogens. 6. Packaging: use modified atmosphere with 3–5% O2 and 5–10% CO2 to inhibit fungal growth. 7. Sorting: remove infected fruit early to prevent spread. These steps target the synergistic interaction by reducing wounding, slowing growth, and lowering inoculum. Monitor with regular sampling.