BCS Written Botany study materials
BCS Written Botany study resources

Conservation Genetics of a Rare Endemic Tree in a Fragmented Landscape

BCS Written Botany · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Conservation Genetics of a Rare Endemic Tree in a Fragmented Landscape

A rare tree species, Elaeocarpus blascoi, is endemic to the Palni Hills, India. It exists in three fragments: Fragment A (200 individuals, 50 ha), Fragment B (50 individuals, 10 ha), and Fragment C (20 individuals, 2 ha). The fragments are separated by tea plantations, and no seed dispersal between them has been observed. Genetic analysis using 10 microsatellite loci shows: Fragment A has allelic richness (AR) = 4.2, expected heterozygosity (He) = 0.62; Fragment B has AR = 2.8, He = 0.45; Fragment C has AR = 1.9, He = 0.28. Inbreeding coefficient (FIS) is 0.12 in A, 0.25 in B, and 0.38 in C. Seed set is 80% in A, 50% in B, and 20% in C. The species is pollinated by bees that cannot cross the plantations. A proposal is to create a corridor between A and B, and to augment C with seedlings from A.

1. Assess the genetic health of each fragment and predict the likely consequences of continued isolation. Which fragment is most at risk and why?

Read the worked answer

Fragment A is relatively healthy: high allelic richness (4.2), moderate heterozygosity (0.62), and low inbreeding (FIS = 0.12), though FIS > 0 indicates some inbreeding. Fragment B has reduced diversity (AR = 2.8, He = 0.45) and higher inbreeding (FIS = 0.25), with seed set at 50%, suggesting inbreeding depression. Fragment C is critically at risk: very low diversity (AR = 1.9, He = 0.28), high inbreeding (FIS = 0.38), and seed set only 20%. The small population size (20) and isolation will lead to genetic drift, further loss of alleles, and increased inbreeding depression, possibly causing an extinction vortex. Fragment C is most at risk because its effective population size is likely below 50, and its reproductive output is already severely reduced. Continued isolation will reduce gene flow, increase homozygosity, and lower fitness. Fragment B is also vulnerable but less immediate.

2. Evaluate the proposed corridor and augmentation. What are the genetic risks and benefits, and what modifications would you recommend?

Read the worked answer

The corridor between A and B would allow gene flow, increasing genetic diversity in B and reducing inbreeding. However, it may also introduce alleles from A that are maladapted to B's conditions, causing outbreeding depression. The risk is moderate because A and B are close and likely share a recent history. Augmenting C with seedlings from A would increase genetic diversity and reduce inbreeding, but if the seedlings are from a few mother trees, they may be related and cause further inbreeding. Also, A and C may have different adaptations. Recommendation: first, test for local adaptation with reciprocal transplants. For the corridor, establish a stepping-stone habitat with native trees to facilitate bee movement, and monitor gene flow. For augmentation, collect seeds from at least 30 mother trees in A and B, grow them in a nursery, and plant a mix in C. Ensure that the introduced individuals are not all from one family. Monitor survival, flowering, and seed set. Consider assisted gene flow only if climate change is a threat. The goal is to increase effective population size above 50 in C and maintain evolutionary potential.