BMDC RQE study materials
BMDC RQE study resources

Consent and Confidentiality in a Teenager with a Sexually Transmitted Infection

BMDC RQE · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Consent and Confidentiality in a Teenager with a Sexually Transmitted Infection

A 16-year-old girl presents to a general practitioner with a 1-week history of vaginal discharge and dysuria. She is sexually active and requests testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). She is accompanied by her mother, who is in the waiting room. The GP suspects chlamydia or gonorrhea. The girl asks that her mother not be informed about the testing or results. The GP is unsure about the legal and ethical obligations regarding consent, confidentiality, and parental involvement. The country's law allows minors to consent to medical treatment if they are deemed competent, but there is no specific statute on STI testing in minors. The mother is insistent on knowing the diagnosis.

1. Discuss the ethical and legal principles involved in this scenario. How should the GP proceed?

Read the worked answer

The key principles are autonomy, confidentiality, beneficence, non-maleficence, and the best interests of the minor. Legally, the girl may be competent to consent to STI testing if she understands the nature and consequences of the test and treatment. The GP should assess her competence (Gillick competence or similar standard). If competent, she can consent to testing and treatment, and confidentiality should be maintained. However, the GP must also consider public health obligations (e.g., partner notification) and the risk of harm to the minor or others.

Proceeding:

  • Speak with the girl alone to assess her understanding and voluntariness.
  • Explain confidentiality and its limits (e.g., if there is risk of serious harm, or if required by law).
  • If she is competent, respect her request for confidentiality. Testing can be done, and results discussed privately.
  • Encourage her to involve her mother, but do not force it. If she refuses, document her decision.
  • If she is not competent, or if there is a risk of abuse or coercion, the GP may need to involve child protection services or her parents, but this should be done carefully.
  • Regarding the mother: The GP should not disclose without the girl's consent. The GP can explain to the mother that confidentiality applies, and if the mother insists, the GP may need to manage the situation by offering to discuss general health issues or by involving a mediator.
  • Partner notification: The GP should discuss with the girl the importance of informing partners and offer support, but this should be done with her consent.

Ethically, the GP must balance the girl's autonomy with her best interests and the mother's concern. The GP should aim to build trust and provide non-judgmental care.

2. What if the girl tests positive for gonorrhea and refuses to inform her partner? What are the GP's obligations?

Read the worked answer

If the girl tests positive for gonorrhea and refuses to inform her partner, the GP has a duty to protect public health while respecting confidentiality. Gonorrhea is a notifiable disease in many jurisdictions; the GP must follow local reporting laws. The GP should:

  • Counsel the girl about the importance of partner notification to prevent reinfection and complications in partners.
  • Offer support and discuss options: she can inform partners herself, or the GP can assist with anonymous notification (e.g., via a partner notification service).
  • If she refuses, the GP must weigh the duty of confidentiality against the duty to warn identifiable third parties at risk. In many guidelines, if a partner is at risk of serious harm and the patient refuses, the GP may disclose the infection to the partner without revealing the patient's identity, but this is usually a last resort and should be done with legal advice.
  • The GP should document the discussion and the girl's decision.
  • The GP should also ensure the girl receives treatment and follow-up.

Legally, the GP may be protected if they follow public health regulations. Ethically, the GP should act in the patient's best interest and the public's interest, but confidentiality should be breached only if necessary to prevent serious harm. The GP should seek advice from a medical defense organization or public health authority if unsure.