BTEB Food & Beverage Cooking study materials
BTEB Food & Beverage Cooking study resources

The New Commis and the Slicer

BTEB Food & Beverage Cooking · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The New Commis and the Slicer

It is 07:30 in a hotel kitchen. A commis who started four days ago is asked by a busy chef de partie to slice 3 kg of cooked beef on the gravity-feed meat slicer for a lunch function. The commis has not been trained on the slicer and says so. The chef de partie replies that "everyone figures it out" and walks away to deal with a delivery. The slicer's blade guard is in place but the last-hand guard is missing, the machine is plugged in, and the blade is set to a 2 mm slice. The commis is 17 years old and on a training contract. Two other staff are in the room but both are working at the stove with their backs turned.

1. Identify the safety and legal issues in this situation and state what should happen before any slicing begins.

Read the worked answer

Issues identified:

  1. Untrained operator on dangerous equipment. A powered slicer with an exposed reciprocating blade is high-risk machinery. The commis has no training, no authorisation, and no supervision - the chef de partie has left the room.
  2. Missing guard. The last-hand guard (the pusher/holder that keeps fingers away from the blade) is absent. Without it, the only thing between the operator's hand and a moving blade is technique the commis does not have.
  3. Age and status. A 17-year-old on a training contract must not be placed at risk; the employer's duty of care and the young worker's heightened vulnerability are relevant factors.
  4. No supervision or isolation. Two colleagues are present but facing away and cannot intervene. No one is designated to watch or stop the machine.
  5. Machine left energised. The slicer is plugged in and set, ready to run.

Before any slicing:

  • The commis must not operate the slicer. This is the correct refusal.
  • The machine should be switched off and unplugged or isolated, and tagged "out of service - guard missing".
  • The chef de partie (or duty manager) must be informed that the guard is missing and that an untrained minor was directed to use the machine.
  • Slicing must be reassigned to a trained, authorised adult, or done by hand or with a knife if the function allows.
  • The missing guard must be replaced before the slicer returns to service, and the incident logged.

2. The commis is worried about being seen as difficult. Draft what they should say, and outline the training and supervision controls that should be in place before they ever use the slicer.

Read the worked answer

What the commis should say (calm, factual, brief):

"I haven't been trained on the slicer and the hand guard is missing, so I'm not going to run it. Can you show me, or can someone trained do the beef? I'll get the machine switched off and tagged so no one else uses it by mistake."

This states the fact, the hazard, the action taken, and offers a solution - it is a safety stop, not a refusal to work.

Controls before first use:

  1. Documented training on the specific machine: guards and their function, blade changing, thickness setting, on/off and emergency stop, safe feeding with the guard, cut-resistant glove where the risk assessment requires it, cleaning with the machine isolated.
  2. Signed authorisation naming the commis as competent for that machine, with a review date.
  3. Supervised practice on a low-risk task (for example slicing vegetables or a soft product) with a competent person beside the machine, until competence is confirmed.
  4. Pre-use check recorded each shift: guards present, blade secure, cable undamaged, machine stable, emergency stop working.
  5. Cleaning procedure taught separately: isolate, remove blade with the correct tool, wash, dry, refit, log.
  6. Escalation route so any worker can stop a task without fear - the commis's refusal should be praised, not penalised.

The chef de partie's "everyone figures it out" is exactly the culture that produces amputations; the duty manager should address it directly.