Choosing a Honours Subject Under Family Pressure
Sumaiya scored GPA 4.50 in HSC. She wants to study Sociology at Dhaka University, but her father insists she pursue BBA because he believes it guarantees a job. Sumaiya's cousin studied BBA and remained unemployed for two years before joining a bank; another cousin with a Sociology degree works for an NGO at a modest salary. Sumaiya is shy, dislikes mathematics, and is strong at writing and analysis. The NU admission process assigns merit by combined test score, and Sociology typically has lower cut-offs than BBA at the same university. Sumaiya has one attempt left and cannot afford private university fees.
1. Identify the decision criteria Sumaiya should weigh and rank them, explaining why raw family preference alone is insufficient.
Read the worked answer
Relevant criteria include: (1) eligibility and cut-off realism given her GPA and test performance; (2) her aptitude - strong writing and analysis, weak mathematics, which favours Sociology over a maths-heavy BBA; (3) financial feasibility - she cannot afford private fees, so public university placement matters; (4) employment prospects, which are uncertain in both fields given her cousins' contrasting outcomes. Family preference is a factor but not a criterion in itself: it is a proxy for the father's concern about employability, which can be addressed with evidence. Ranking should put eligibility and aptitude first because they determine whether she can succeed at all, then finances, then career outlook. Treating the father's preference as decisive ignores her comparative advantage and the anecdotal, non-representative nature of the two cousin examples.
2. Her father cites the unemployed BBA cousin as proof. How should Sumaiya evaluate this evidence?
Read the worked answer
Two individual cases are anecdotes, not data. One unemployed BBA graduate and one employed Sociology graduate say nothing reliable about average outcomes for either field. Sample size is two, selection is arbitrary (relatives), and no information is given about the cousins' grades, effort, networks, or local job markets. The correct reasoning is to seek base rates - graduate employment statistics by subject - rather than generalise from family stories. Sumaiya should note that both fields have variable outcomes and that individual effort and skills often matter more than the label of the degree. This reframes the disagreement from 'which degree guarantees a job' (neither does) to 'which degree lets me build marketable skills I can actually develop.'
3. Given the lower Sociology cut-off, propose a concrete strategy for her single remaining attempt.
Read the worked answer
Because Sociology's cut-off is lower, her probability of admission is higher if she targets it, which reduces risk on her one attempt. A sound strategy: prepare primarily for the Sociology track, focusing on her strengths in writing and analysis while shoring up weaker quantitative sections enough to clear the combined score. She should verify the exact subject-wise requirements and seat numbers before committing. As a hedge, she can list a related social-science subject as a backup preference where the process allows. She should also present her father with a plan - target score, backup subject, and a skills-building path (e.g., research or communication skills) - to convert the dispute into a shared, evidence-based decision rather than a clash of preferences.