UNB IDR Entrance study materials
UNB IDR Entrance study resources

Two Patients, One Nurse: A Deteriorating Post-Operative Patient and a Confused Boarder

UNB IDR Entrance · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Two Patients, One Nurse: A Deteriorating Post-Operative Patient and a Confused Boarder

You are the only registered nurse on a 12-bed night ward. At 02:10 you have two concerns. Bed 4: Mr. Adeyemi, 54, day 2 after emergency laparotomy, has become restless, with HR 124, BP 96/58, RR 26, SpO2 92% on 4 L, temperature 38.4 C, and 20 mL of urine in the last 3 hours. He is confused and trying to climb out of bed. Bed 9: Mrs. Chen, 82, admitted with a urinary tract infection and mild dementia, is repeatedly wandering into other patients' rooms and has twice tried to sit in another patient's bed. A healthcare assistant is on the ward but cannot give medications or make clinical assessments. The on-call physician is covering three wards and has not answered two pages. The rapid-response team is available by phone.

1. Rank your actions for the next 30 minutes and justify the ranking.

Read the worked answer

Mr. Adeyemi is the immediate life threat; Mrs. Chen's risk is real but lower and can be mitigated with environmental measures while help is summoned.

Next 30 minutes:

  1. Call the rapid-response team for Mr. Adeyemi now, without waiting for the on-call physician. His picture - new confusion, tachycardia, hypotension, tachypnoea, fever, and oliguria - suggests sepsis or another acute deterioration, and time matters.
  2. Stay with him, apply continuous monitoring, sit him upright, titrate oxygen to target, and check the drain, wound, and abdomen. Obtain a point-of-care lactate and glucose if available and prepare for fluids and antibiotics on order.
  3. Ask the healthcare assistant to stay with Mrs. Chen in a supervised area near the nurses' station, with the bed low, a falls mat, and a sensor alarm if available. Provide orienting cues and regular toileting.
  4. Delegate the phone escalation to the assistant for the physician while you manage Mr. Adeyemi, with clear instructions on what to say and to report back.
  5. Document times, observations, and who was called.

Justification: airway, breathing, and circulation threats come first, and Mr. Adeyemi's deterioration is potentially reversible within minutes to hours. Mrs. Chen's wandering is a safety risk that supervision largely controls, so it is managed in parallel rather than ignored.

2. What do you do about the unresponsive on-call physician, and how do you escalate safely?

Read the worked answer

Escalation is a clinical intervention, and an unanswered page is a finding to act on rather than a reason to wait.

Steps:

  1. Re-page with a structured message: identify the patient, the ward, the observations with the trend, your concern, and your specific request. Say that this is an escalation.
  2. Activate the rapid-response team, which exists precisely for this situation and does not require the on-call physician's permission.
  3. If the rapid-response team is delayed, contact the nurse in charge or the site coordinator and the next tier of medical cover according to the escalation policy.
  4. Record each call with the time, the number dialled, the person reached, and the response. If no one responds, record that too and continue escalating up the chain.
  5. Initiate standing protocols you are authorized to use - for example, oxygen and continuous monitoring - and prepare equipment and drugs so that treatment begins immediately when a prescriber arrives.

Reasoning: the duty to escalate does not end because one person is unavailable. A documented, structured escalation protects the patient and demonstrates that you followed the pathway. Doing nothing while waiting for a callback is the failure mode that serious-event reviews repeatedly identify.

3. After the shift, how would you raise the staffing and escalation problems without blaming individuals?

Read the worked answer

Frame the report around patient risk and system design, with specific evidence and a proposed change.

Report content: the time of the deterioration, the observations and their trend, the time of each page and the response, the rapid-response activation and its timing, the measures taken for Mrs. Chen, and the outcome. State the staffing level and skill mix factually. Avoid naming individuals as the cause; describe the system - a single registered nurse for 12 patients overnight, a physician covering three wards, and an escalation policy that did not specify a fallback when the first responder did not answer.

Proposals: a written fallback tier with response-time expectations; automatic rapid-response activation criteria that the bedside nurse can use without permission; a second registered nurse or a supervisor on site overnight; and a review of the observation frequency for post-operative patients. Route it through the incident reporting system and the ward quality meeting, and ask for feedback on whether the changes were implemented.

Reasoning: a report that reads as a complaint about a colleague is easy to dismiss. A report that shows a predictable failure point and a feasible fix is more likely to change practice, and it is the professional obligation that follows a near miss.