Best Execution and Order Handling in a Thinly Traded Bond
You are the head of trading at a Bulgarian investment firm. A client has placed an order to buy EUR 500,000 of a corporate bond issued by a Bulgarian company. The bond is listed on the Bulgarian Stock Exchange (BSE) but is thinly traded, with an average daily volume of EUR 50,000. The client's order is large relative to typical volume. The firm's best execution policy requires considering price, cost, speed, likelihood of execution and settlement, and size. The firm has access to two trading venues: the BSE and a multilateral trading facility (MTF) operated by a regional exchange. The BSE has a bid-ask spread of 2%, while the MTF has a spread of 1.5% but lower liquidity. The firm also has the option to execute the order over-the-counter (OTC) with a market maker who has quoted a price with a 1% spread but requires a minimum trade size of EUR 300,000. The client has not given specific instructions. The firm's execution policy states that for illiquid bonds, it may execute OTC if it believes it will achieve a better result for the client. The compliance officer must ensure that the firm achieves best execution and properly handles the order.
1. Evaluate the best execution factors and determine which execution venue or method the firm should choose for this order.
Read the worked answer
The firm must consider the best execution factors: price, cost, speed, likelihood of execution and settlement, size, and any other relevant consideration. For this large order relative to average volume, the likelihood of execution and size are critical. The BSE has a 2% spread but limited liquidity; executing EUR 500,000 when average daily volume is EUR 50,000 could move the market significantly and result in a worse price. The MTF has a 1.5% spread but even lower liquidity, so likelihood of execution is low. The OTC market maker offers a 1% spread and requires a minimum of EUR 300,000, which the order meets. OTC execution would allow the firm to execute the full size at a known price, avoiding market impact. Although OTC may have counterparty risk, the firm must assess whether the market maker is reliable. Given the client's order size and the illiquidity, OTC is likely to provide the best result in terms of price and likelihood of execution. The firm's policy permits OTC for illiquid bonds if it believes it achieves a better result. Therefore, the firm should execute OTC with the market maker, provided it documents the rationale and ensures the price is fair. The firm should also consider whether the client should be informed about the execution method, but no specific instruction was given. The firm must regularly review its execution policy and venues.
2. What order handling and record-keeping requirements apply, and how should the firm document its decision?
Read the worked answer
Under MiFID II, the firm must take all sufficient steps to obtain the best possible result for the client. It must have an order execution policy and provide appropriate information to clients. For order handling, the firm must: (1) execute the order promptly and fairly; (2) not misuse information about the order; (3) inform the client of any material difficulty in executing the order; (4) keep records of all orders and decisions. Specifically, the firm should document: the client's order details (size, bond, price limits), the venues considered, the prices and spreads available, the rationale for choosing OTC (including why it provides best execution given the order size and liquidity), and the execution details (price, time, counterparty). The firm must also monitor the execution quality and review its policy annually. If the firm executes OTC, it should ensure the price is consistent with market conditions and document how it verified fairness. The compliance officer should review the documentation to ensure it meets regulatory requirements. Additionally, the firm must report the transaction to the regulator if required (e.g., transaction reporting). The key is to demonstrate that the firm acted in the client's best interest and can justify its choice.