Cash Buyer, Shell Company, and a Suspicious Deposit
A sales agent at a Bahraini brokerage receives a walk-in client, Mr. K, who wants to buy a BHD 420,000 apartment in a ready development. Mr. K presents a passport from a jurisdiction on the firm's higher-risk list and says the purchase will be made by a company, Orion Holdings, registered in a secrecy jurisdiction. He cannot name the beneficial owner, saying only that it is a family matter. He offers a BHD 90,000 cash deposit immediately, with the balance to follow from an unnamed third party. He is impatient, declines to complete the standard source-of-funds form, and asks the agent to keep the transaction off the shared office system. The agent's commission depends on closing within 10 days.
1. Apply the customer due diligence and risk assessment framework to this client. What must the agent do before any transaction proceeds?
Read the worked answer
This is a textbook high-risk file and the agent must not proceed on the current information.
Risk factors present: a higher-risk jurisdiction passport, a corporate buyer registered in a secrecy jurisdiction, an unidentified beneficial owner, a large cash component, an unnamed third-party payer, urgency pressure, and a request to avoid the firm's records. Each is a red flag; together they are decisive.
Required steps before proceeding:
- Identify and verify the customer and, critically, the beneficial owner of Orion Holdings, using reliable, independent sources. A statement that it is a family matter is not verification.
- Conduct enhanced due diligence because of the jurisdiction and structure, including understanding the ownership and control chain and the purpose of the transaction.
- Establish source of funds and source of wealth for both the deposit and the balance, and identify the third-party payer. Unexplained third-party payments are a classic layering indicator.
- Refuse the request to keep the matter off the system. All client activity must be recorded in the firm's systems.
- Escalate to the compliance officer or MLRO immediately.
If the client will not provide the information, the firm must decline the relationship or the transaction and consider whether a suspicious transaction report is required.
2. The agent worries that declining will cost the commission and anger the client. Explain the reporting obligation and the protection available, and what the agent should do about the record-keeping request.
Read the worked answer
The commission is irrelevant to the legal obligation. Where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are the proceeds of crime or are linked to terrorist financing, the firm must report to the competent authority; suspicion, not proof, is the threshold.
Tipping off is prohibited. The agent must not tell Mr. K that a report has been or may be made, or do anything that could prejudice an investigation. He should give a neutral reason for pausing or declining, such as inability to complete required verification, without disclosing the reporting.
Protection: a report made in good faith to the competent authority provides a defence against liability for breach of confidentiality and for the underlying transaction, provided the firm follows the applicable framework on handling and consent before proceeding. The agent should document his concerns contemporaneously and route them through the MLRO rather than deciding alone.
On record-keeping: the request to keep the deal off the system must be refused outright. Records of client identification, transactions, and internal reports must be maintained for the required retention period and made available to supervisors. Complying with the request would itself be a serious breach and would obstruct any later investigation. The agent should log the request itself as a risk indicator.