Dual Agency Pressure on a Hamilton Apartment Sale
A licensed salesperson, Mr. Simmons, lists a two-bedroom apartment in Hamilton for $875,000 on behalf of an estate. A prospective buyer, Ms. Ferreira, visits the open house without an agent and asks Mr. Simmons to 'look after her interests too.' She says she is pre-approved for $900,000 and is willing to offer full asking price that day. Mr. Simmons knows the estate has received no other offers in eleven weeks and that the deceased owner's daughter is anxious to settle quickly. He also knows the apartment's monthly maintenance fee is about to rise by 18 percent, which is not yet reflected in the listing. Mr. Simmons' brokerage has a written policy permitting dual agency only with the informed written consent of both parties.
1. Can Mr. Simmons act for both the estate and Ms. Ferreira? What must happen before any dual agency arises?
Read the worked answer
Dual agency is possible only if both parties give informed written consent after full disclosure of the conflicts. Mr. Simmons must first disclose to Ms. Ferreira that he represents the estate and owes it loyalty, confidentiality, and a duty to obtain the best price. He must disclose to the estate's representative that Ms. Ferreira has asked him to act for her and that he may acquire confidential information from her. Neither consent can be inferred from silence or from a general brokerage policy; the policy merely sets the framework.
Critically, Mr. Simmons cannot use the estate's urgency or its eleven weeks without offers as leverage while purporting to represent Ms. Ferreira. If both consent, he must remain neutral on price and cannot advocate for either side. If either party declines, he must refer Ms. Ferreira to an independent agent before discussing her willingness to pay full asking price. His knowledge of her $900,000 pre-approval is confidential and cannot be shared with the estate.
2. What must Mr. Simmons do about the upcoming 18 percent maintenance fee increase?
Read the worked answer
The increase is a material fact affecting value and affordability. Mr. Simmons must disclose it to Ms. Ferreira regardless of whether he acts for her, because concealing it would be misleading. If he acts only for the estate, he still cannot make false or misleading statements, and silence about a known imminent cost increase that the listing omits may amount to misleading conduct.
He should also correct the listing so the fee disclosure is accurate. If he acts as a dual agent, he must ensure both parties understand the increase. He should not use the information to push Ms. Ferreira into a higher offer, nor use her ignorance to secure a quick full-price sale for the estate. The cleanest course is to disclose the increase in writing, update the listing, and let Ms. Ferreira reassess her offer with accurate information.
3. Ms. Ferreira offers full asking price that day. How should Mr. Simmons handle the offer and the estate's urgency?
Read the worked answer
Mr. Simmons must present the offer promptly and accurately to the estate's representative, without using Ms. Ferreira's confidential pre-approval or her emotional attachment to the apartment as bargaining material. If he is a dual agent, he must not negotiate on either side's behalf; he should transmit offers and information even-handedly and let each party decide.
The estate's urgency is not a reason to withhold the offer or to advise Ms. Ferreira to raise it. Nor is it a reason to conceal the maintenance increase to speed a sale. Mr. Simmons should document that he disclosed the increase, confirm the consent status, and record that the offer was presented without advocacy. If dual agency consent was never validly obtained, he must step back from advising Ms. Ferreira and refer her to independent representation before any further negotiation.