The Southampton Beachfront Listing and the Undisclosed Erosion Report
A seller, Mrs. Lightbourne, lists a beachfront home in Southampton for $3.2 million. The listing agent, Ms. Cann, is told by Mrs. Lightbourne that a coastal engineer's report from 2022 predicted significant erosion within ten to fifteen years and recommended relocating the septic system. Mrs. Lightbourne asks Ms. Cann to keep the report 'between us' because it would 'scare buyers off.' The property has been on the market for seven months with two price reductions. A buyer, Mr. Zuill, is interested and asks Ms. Cann directly whether there are any coastal or environmental issues he should know about. Ms. Cann also knows the neighbouring property has applied for a seawall permit.
1. How should Ms. Cann respond to Mr. Zuill's direct question, given Mrs. Lightbourne's instruction?
Read the worked answer
Ms. Cann must answer honestly. A direct question about coastal or environmental issues cannot be met with a misleading denial or a vague deflection. The erosion report is material to value, insurability, and the buyer's intended use. If Ms. Cann says there are no issues, she misrepresents the position. If she says 'the seller hasn't told me anything,' that is evasive and likely misleading.
She should tell Mrs. Lightbourne that she cannot conceal a known material defect in the face of a direct question, and that the instruction conflicts with her professional obligations. She should disclose the existence of the 2022 report and its general findings, and recommend that Mr. Zuill obtain his own coastal assessment. Confidentiality to the seller does not extend to assisting a misrepresentation. If Mrs. Lightbourne insists on concealment, Ms. Cann should consider whether she can continue the listing and should seek guidance from her broker.
2. Does Ms. Cann have to volunteer the erosion report if Mr. Zuill never asks?
Read the worked answer
The position is more nuanced than when a direct question is asked, but the safer and more professional course is still to disclose. In many common-law jurisdictions, caveat emptor means a seller need not volunteer every defect, but a seller and agent cannot actively conceal a known material defect or make statements that create a false impression. Here, the listing has already been reduced twice, and the property is marketed as beachfront without qualification. Silence in those circumstances risks misleading conduct.
Ms. Cann should at minimum ensure the listing does not overstate the property's durability or insurability and should recommend that Mrs. Lightbourne authorise disclosure. Given the direct question in this case, the point is largely academic: once asked, she must answer truthfully. She should document her advice to the seller either way.
3. How should the pending seawall permit application affect the marketing and any offer?
Read the worked answer
The neighbouring seawall application is a material neighbouring development issue. It could affect Mr. Zuill's views, drainage, beach access, or the shoreline's behaviour, and it signals that coastal management is active in the area. Ms. Cann should disclose it and direct Mr. Zuill to the planning authority for details rather than speculate about the outcome.
She should not present the application as a solution to the erosion risk. A seawall may or may not be approved and may have its own impacts. The marketing should describe the property accurately, disclose the erosion report and the neighbouring application, and invite buyers to conduct their own due diligence. If Mr. Zuill makes an offer, it should be conditional on satisfactory coastal and planning investigations, and Ms. Cann should ensure the seller understands that the price may reflect the disclosed risk.