ANAC CEL Theoretical Exam (Airframe Group) study materials
ANAC CEL Theoretical Exam (Airframe Group) study resources

Engine Change Logbook Discrepancy Before Release

ANAC CEL Theoretical Exam (Airframe Group) · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Engine Change Logbook Discrepancy Before Release

An aircraft undergoes an engine change. The removed engine had 1,200 hours since overhaul; the installed engine has 800 hours since overhaul and a different part number suffix. The mechanic records the engine change in the airframe logbook, notes the new engine serial number, and signs for the work. The engine logbook is updated with the installation but the total time in service is not carried forward correctly, and the previous engine's last shop visit record is left in the file. A second technician is asked to sign the release to service because the first has gone off shift. The aircraft is scheduled for a passenger flight in two hours. The maintenance program requires an engine change inspection and a functional check of the engine indicating and fire warning systems.

1. Identify the documentation and release-to-service problems in this scenario and explain the risk each creates.

Read the worked answer

Several problems exist. The engine logbook total time is not carried forward correctly, which corrupts the life-limited part and overhaul tracking for the installed engine; future maintenance and airworthiness decisions would be based on wrong times. The previous engine's shop visit record left in the file creates a traceability error that could cause the wrong history to be attributed to the installed engine.

The part number suffix difference must be verified against the approved configuration and the aircraft's eligibility; an unverified suffix change could mean an incompatible engine variant. The engine change inspection and the functional checks of indicating and fire warning systems are required by the maintenance program and must be completed and recorded before release.

Finally, a second technician cannot simply sign the release for work they did not perform or verify. Release to service requires that the signatory has ensured the work was completed in accordance with approved data and that all required inspections and checks are recorded. Signing without verification is a false certification risk.

2. Describe the steps required to correct the records and legitimately release the aircraft, including the role of the second technician.

Read the worked answer

The records must be corrected before release. The engine logbook should be reconstructed from the removed engine's certified records and the installed engine's documentation, showing correct total time, cycles, and shop visit history. The obsolete record for the previous engine must be removed from the active file and archived appropriately, with a clear note explaining the correction. The part number suffix must be verified against the approved engine configuration and eligibility for the aircraft.

The second technician must personally verify that the engine change inspection was performed, that the indicating and fire warning functional checks were accomplished and recorded, and that all connections, controls, and servicing are complete. Verification may include reviewing task cards, inspecting the installation, and witnessing or repeating functional checks as required. Only then may the release be signed, and the signatory must be authorized for that release.

If time does not permit proper verification and checks, the aircraft must not be released. The two-hour schedule is not a basis for shortcutting airworthiness requirements. All corrections and verifications must be documented in the maintenance records.