qPCR Standard Curve with Inhibited Samples
A qPCR assay quantifies a bacterial gene from soil DNA. The standard curve uses purified plasmid DNA at 10^2 to 10^8 copies per reaction and gives a slope of -3.6 and R^2 of 0.998. Soil DNA extracts are co-extracted with humic acids. When a known spike of 10^5 plasmid copies is added to soil extracts, the measured value is 10^4.2 copies, while the same spike in buffer reads 10^5.0. Diluting soil extracts 1:10 improves spike recovery to 10^4.8. The undiluted soil samples show a mean of 10^3.5 copies for the target gene, and the detection limit is 10^2 copies.
1. Calculate the amplification efficiency from the slope and assess whether the standard curve is acceptable.
Read the worked answer
Efficiency E = 10^(-1/slope) - 1. With slope -3.6, -1/slope = 0.2778, 10^0.2778 = 1.896, so E = 0.896, or about 90%. The acceptable range is typically 90-110%, corresponding to slopes between about -3.1 and -3.6. A slope of -3.6 is at the low edge but acceptable. R^2 of 0.998 indicates good linearity across 10^2 to 10^8. However, the standard curve is built on purified plasmid DNA, which may amplify more efficiently than soil-derived DNA due to inhibitors and matrix effects. The curve's quality does not guarantee accuracy in soil samples; spike recovery is needed, and it shows inhibition. So the curve is technically acceptable but not sufficient to validate soil quantitation.
2. Quantify the inhibition and estimate the corrected target gene abundance in undiluted soil.
Read the worked answer
Spike recovery in undiluted soil is 10^4.2 / 10^5.0 = 10^-0.8 = 0.158, or about 16% recovery. That means the assay reads about 6.3-fold lower than the true input. At 1:10 dilution, recovery is 10^4.8 / 10^5.0 = 10^-0.2 = 0.63, or 63%. The undiluted soil target reads 10^3.5 copies. Correcting for 16% recovery gives 10^3.5 / 0.158 = 10^3.5 x 6.3 = about 10^4.3 copies. This is an estimate because inhibition may not be uniform across targets and the correction assumes the spike and target are inhibited equally. The 1:10 dilution data suggest the true value is closer to the dilution-corrected estimate; reporting both is prudent. The corrected value is above the detection limit, so the target is present.
3. What should be reported, and what additional control would you add before publishing?
Read the worked answer
Report the measured values, the spike recovery, and the dilution-corrected estimates, and state that undiluted values are inhibited and likely underestimates. Do not report only the raw 10^3.5 value as absolute abundance. Add an internal amplification control (IAC) added to each sample to monitor inhibition per sample, and run multiple dilutions (1:5, 1:10, 1:20) to identify the dilution at which recovery plateaus. Also include a no-template control and a negative extraction control. If inhibition persists, use a DNA cleanup column or a different extraction method. The standard curve should be repeated with soil-like matrix or the spike-in approach used to validate the soil assay. Report the limit of detection and quantification in the soil matrix, not just in buffer.