JCE Moral Education 18 study materials
JCE Moral Education 18 study resources

Academic Integrity in a Peer Tutoring Program

JCE Moral Education 18 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Academic Integrity in a Peer Tutoring Program

You are the coordinator of a peer tutoring program at a middle school. The program pairs high-achieving eighth graders with sixth graders who need help in math. One of your tutors, Maya, is a straight-A student who has been tutoring a sixth grader, Leo, for two months. Leo's math teacher reports that Leo's homework grades have improved dramatically, but his test scores remain low. The teacher suspects Leo might be copying Maya's work. You investigate and find that Maya has been doing Leo's homework for him, not just helping him understand concepts. Maya explains that Leo's parents are going through a divorce and he is stressed; she wanted to help him pass. She didn't realize it was wrong because she was 'just being a good friend.' Leo's teacher is demanding that Leo receive a zero on all copied assignments and that Maya be removed from the tutoring program. Maya is devastated and says she'll do anything to make it right. The program guidelines state that tutors must 'facilitate learning, not provide answers,' but do not specify consequences for violations.

1. What are the ethical issues for Maya, for Leo, and for the tutoring program? How should you, as coordinator, address the situation while upholding academic integrity and showing compassion?

Read the worked answer

Ethical issues include: academic dishonesty (Maya did Leo's work, violating the program's purpose and the school's honor code), fairness (other students do their own work), compassion (Maya's motive was to help a friend in distress), and role responsibility (Maya failed to follow program guidelines). For Leo, there is a question of accountability: he accepted the help and may not have understood the consequences. For the program, there is a need to clarify guidelines and consequences. As coordinator, you should first speak with Maya to help her understand why her actions were wrong: doing homework for Leo prevents him from learning and gives a false impression of his abilities. You should also acknowledge her compassionate intent and guide her to appropriate ways to support Leo (e.g., study skills, encouragement, seeking help from a counselor). For Leo, you should involve his teacher and parents to address the underlying stress and provide proper support. Regarding consequences, you should avoid a punitive approach that ignores context. Instead, propose a restorative process: Maya should apologize to Leo and his teacher, complete a reflection on academic integrity, and receive additional training on tutoring ethics. She could also help Leo review the copied assignments to ensure he understands the material. The teacher's demand for zeros on all assignments may be excessive if Leo can demonstrate learning; a fair compromise is to allow Leo to redo the assignments with proper support. Finally, you should work with the program to create clear guidelines and consequences for future violations, emphasizing education over punishment.

2. How should the coordinator communicate the decision to Maya, Leo, and the teacher? What principles should guide these conversations?

Read the worked answer

The coordinator should communicate with each party separately, using principles of respect, transparency, and restorative justice. With Maya: Start by affirming her kindness, then clearly explain why her actions were academically dishonest and harmful to Leo's learning. Outline the consequences (e.g., temporary removal from tutoring, training, reflection) and offer a path to return. Emphasize that she can still support Leo in appropriate ways. With Leo: Speak gently, acknowledge his stress, and explain that copying is not acceptable but that he will be given a chance to make up the work honestly. Involve his parents and teacher in a support plan. With the teacher: Listen to concerns, explain the restorative approach, and propose a plan for Leo to redo assignments and receive additional help. Ensure the teacher feels heard and that academic standards are upheld. Throughout, maintain confidentiality where possible and focus on learning and growth for all involved.