JCE Moral Education 18 study materials
JCE Moral Education 18 study resources

The Unpaid Internship: Equity and Access in Career Preparation

JCE Moral Education 18 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Unpaid Internship: Equity and Access in Career Preparation

You are the coordinator of a high school's career readiness program. A local tech company has offered unpaid summer internships to five students. The internships are prestigious and could lead to college scholarships and job offers. However, they require students to work 20 hours per week for eight weeks and provide their own transportation and lunch. The program has 20 applicants, but only five spots. Selection is based on grades, interview, and teacher recommendations. The school's equity policy states that opportunities should be accessible to all students regardless of socioeconomic status. Several low-income students who are highly qualified have expressed interest but cannot afford transportation or unpaid time. Some teachers argue that the internships should be paid or that the school should provide stipends. The company refuses to pay, saying the experience is the compensation. The principal asks you to decide how to allocate the internships and whether to accept the offer under these conditions.

1. What are the ethical issues related to equity, fairness, and access in this situation? How should you balance the value of the opportunity with the barriers it creates for some students?

Read the worked answer

Ethical issues include: equity vs. merit, access vs. excellence, exploitation of unpaid labor, and the school's duty to serve all students. The unpaid internships create a barrier for low-income students, violating the school's equity policy. Selecting only students who can afford to participate would perpetuate privilege. However, the internships offer valuable experience and connections. The coordinator should first explore solutions: ask the company to provide transportation vouchers or lunch, or offer a hybrid/remote option. If the company refuses, the school could use discretionary funds to provide stipends or organize carpooling. The selection process should not penalize students for financial need; instead, the school should actively recruit and support low-income applicants. If the barriers cannot be mitigated, the coordinator should consider declining the offer or accepting it with a clear plan to support selected students. The decision should involve input from students, parents, and staff, and be transparent about the trade-offs. Ultimately, the school should not endorse an opportunity that excludes students based on income.

2. How should the coordinator communicate with the company, the applicants, and the school community about the decision? What steps can be taken to ensure fairness and transparency?

Read the worked answer

First, communicate with the company: explain the equity concerns, propose solutions (stipends, transportation support, paid internship), and be prepared to decline if they are unwilling to accommodate. If the company agrees to support, proceed; if not, consider alternative partnerships. With applicants: be transparent about the selection criteria and any support available. Encourage all qualified students to apply, and assure them that financial need will not be a barrier. If the internships proceed, provide selected low-income students with resources (e.g., stipends, transportation). With the school community: explain the decision in a newsletter or meeting, emphasizing the school's commitment to equity. If the offer is declined, explain why and seek other opportunities. Throughout, maintain confidentiality of applicants' financial situations. To ensure fairness, use a blind review of applications where possible, and include a diverse panel for interviews. Document the process and be open to feedback.