MTTC Automotive Trade Test study materials
MTTC Automotive Trade Test study resources

Pull After Alignment on a Vehicle With New Tires

MTTC Automotive Trade Test · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Pull After Alignment on a Vehicle With New Tires

A 2018 mid-size SUV comes in after a four-wheel alignment at another shop, complaining of a steady pull to the right on a flat highway. The customer also had four new tires installed the same week. Your alignment rack reads: front camber left -0.4 degrees, right -0.1 degrees; front caster left 3.2 degrees, right 2.1 degrees; front toe left 0.05 degrees, right 0.02 degrees; rear camber and toe within specification. Tire pressures are set to the door label. A test drive confirms the pull, and it is worse at highway speed. Cross-switching the two front tires changes the pull to the left. The customer wants the alignment redone at your shop and expects you to 'just set the toe.'

1. Use the alignment readings and the tire swap result to determine the primary cause of the pull, and explain why the caster split matters.

Read the worked answer

Caster is the primary alignment contributor to a directional pull. The left front has 3.2 degrees and the right has 2.1 degrees, a 1.1-degree split, with less positive caster on the right. Lower caster on one side reduces that wheel's self-centering force, so the vehicle drifts toward the side with less caster, which matches the pull to the right. Camber also favors a right pull because the right front is closer to zero (less negative) than the left, but a 0.3-degree camber difference is a secondary factor compared with the caster split. Toe is essentially equal side to side and does not cause a steady pull, though it affects tire wear and steering response.

The tire cross-switch is decisive: moving the front tires changed the pull direction, which proves a tire is contributing. A radial tire with a shifted belt or conicity generates a lateral force that mimics an alignment pull. So there are two causes here: the caster split and a defective tire. Setting toe alone would address neither.

2. The customer insists on a toe-only adjustment. Explain what you would do and say, and how you would verify the repair before returning the vehicle.

Read the worked answer

I would explain that toe does not cause a steady pull and that setting toe alone would leave the vehicle pulling and could wear the new tires. I would show the customer the printed readings and the tire swap result, and recommend correcting the caster split to within the manufacturer's cross-caster tolerance, then addressing the tire.

On this vehicle, caster is typically adjusted by moving shims or a cam at the lower control arm or strut, so I would follow the service procedure rather than bending components. I would set caster within tolerance side to side, set camber within tolerance, and set total toe to specification with the steering wheel centered. Then I would identify the defective tire by the swap test and replace or warranty it, since no alignment can correct a tire that generates lateral force.

Verification: test drive on a flat road at highway speed in both directions to rule out road crown, confirm the steering wheel is centered, and recheck the alignment readings. Document the before and after readings, the tire swap result, and the customer's original request so the record shows why toe-only was declined.