Iron in a Lake After a Storm
A lake receives runoff from a subdivision. After a heavy storm, monitoring shows dissolved iron at 0.9 mg/L (background 0.1 mg/L) and a sharp drop in dissolved oxygen in the bottom 2 m, from 8 mg/L to 2 mg/L. The lake is 6 m deep and stratifies in summer. Algae counts triple within a week of the storm, then crash, and a fish kill follows. Residents blame the subdivision's lawn fertilizer. The developer blames natural lake processes.
1. Explain how the storm could produce the observed sequence of events, and evaluate the two competing explanations.
Read the worked answer
Plausible chain of events:
- Storm runoff carries sediment, organic matter, and nutrients (including phosphorus and nitrogen) from lawns, roads, and disturbed soil into the lake. The iron spike (0.9 mg/L versus 0.1 mg/L background) is a tracer of soil-derived runoff, since iron is abundant in soils and sediments.
- Organic loading from runoff and dead algae sinks and decomposes. Decomposition consumes dissolved oxygen, which explains the bottom-water drop from 8 to 2 mg/L.
- Nutrient pulse fuels the algal bloom; when the bloom crashes, the dead algae add more oxygen demand, reinforcing the low-oxygen bottom layer.
- Fish kill follows from low oxygen in the bottom water and from the decomposition zone expanding upward.
Evaluating the claims: the developer is partly right that natural stratification and decomposition happen without any subdivision. But the timing - a storm followed by an iron spike, a bloom, a crash, and a kill - points to an external pulse. The iron signature is the key clue: it indicates soil erosion entering the lake, which is consistent with construction or lawn runoff. Neither side is fully correct; the storm-triggered runoff is the likely trigger, superimposed on natural summer stratification.
2. Recommend two monitoring or management actions and explain what each would show.
Read the worked answer
Action 1: Sample runoff at storm drains and compare nutrient concentrations before, during, and after storms. This would show whether the subdivision is a significant source. If phosphorus and nitrogen spike at outfalls during storms and correlate with the lake's algal response, the subdivision is implicated. If outfall concentrations are low and the lake responds to inflows from other directions, the source lies elsewhere.
Action 2: Profile dissolved oxygen and iron with depth, weekly through the summer. This would separate storm effects from normal stratification. If bottom-water oxygen falls below about 2 mg/L every summer regardless of storms, the developer's "natural process" claim gains support. If the low-oxygen zone appears or expands only after storms, the runoff trigger is confirmed. Iron released from sediments under low oxygen can also be distinguished from iron washed in by runoff by sampling at different depths.
Together these actions turn a blame dispute into a testable question and support a targeted fix such as a stormwater retention pond or a shoreline buffer.