Insurance Premium Tax and the Retaliatory Tax
An insurance company domiciled in State A is authorized to do business in California. In 2023, the company wrote $100 million in gross premiums in California, of which $20 million were from policies covering California risks but sold to policyholders in State A. The company also wrote $50 million in premiums in State A. State A imposes a premium tax rate of 1.5% and allows a credit for taxes paid to other states. California imposes a gross premiums tax of 2.35% on California premiums. The company claims that the $20 million in premiums from policies sold to State A policyholders should be exempt from California tax because the policies were solicited and sold in State A. The company also argues that California's retaliatory tax should not apply because State A's rate is lower. The California Department of Insurance (CDI) audits the company and assesses additional tax on the $20 million.
1. Are the premiums from policies sold to State A policyholders but covering California risks subject to California gross premiums tax? Explain.
Read the worked answer
Under California law, the gross premiums tax applies to all premiums received by an insurer for insurance on risks located in California, regardless of where the policy was solicited or sold. The key factor is the location of the risk, not the location of the policyholder or the sale. Since the $20 million in premiums covers California risks, they are subject to California gross premiums tax. The company's argument that the sale occurred in State A is irrelevant. California asserts tax jurisdiction based on the risk being in California. Therefore, the CDI correctly assessed tax on those premiums. The company may be entitled to a credit for taxes paid to State A on the same premiums, but that depends on California law and the existence of a retaliatory tax provision or reciprocity. Generally, California does not allow a credit for taxes paid to other states on California risks, but the retaliatory tax may provide relief if State A imposes a higher tax on California insurers. Here, State A's rate is lower, so no retaliatory tax relief.
2. Does California's retaliatory tax apply to this company? Calculate the potential retaliatory tax, if any.
Read the worked answer
California's retaliatory tax is designed to ensure that insurers from other states pay the same total taxes and fees in California that California insurers would pay in that other state. The tax is computed by comparing the aggregate tax burden imposed by California on the foreign insurer with the aggregate burden that the insurer's home state would impose on a California insurer. If the home state's burden is higher, California imposes a retaliatory tax equal to the difference. Here, State A imposes a 1.5% premium tax, while California imposes 2.35%. Since State A's rate is lower, a California insurer doing business in State A would pay less tax than a State A insurer pays in California. Therefore, California's retaliatory tax would not apply because the foreign insurer is not disadvantaged; rather, it pays lower taxes in its home state. The retaliatory tax is not triggered when the home state's taxes are lower. Thus, no retaliatory tax is due. The company's argument that retaliatory tax should not apply because State A's rate is lower is correct, but that does not exempt the California premiums from the gross premiums tax.