Suicide Risk on a Medical Floor After an Overdose
Mr. Okafor, 45, was admitted to a general medical unit 18 hours ago after an intentional overdose of his own gabapentin and alcohol. He is medically stable, on no hold, and has agreed to a psychiatric consult scheduled for tomorrow morning. He has major depressive disorder, a prior attempt at age 30, and recently lost his job and his housing. He tells you, 'Don't bother with the sitter, I'm not going to do anything stupid.' Overnight staffing is short, and the charge nurse suggests placing him in a room near the nurses' station instead of providing a continuous sitter, since he 'denies intent.'
1. Evaluate the adequacy of the proposed plan and identify the risk factors that bear on the decision.
Read the worked answer
The proposed plan is not adequate on its own. A single denial of intent does not offset a recent serious attempt, and the timing matters: risk is often highest in the days after discharge from medical stabilization, and he is only 18 hours out from the overdose. His risk factors include a prior attempt, major depressive disorder, recent job loss, recent housing loss, and the use of alcohol with medication, which increases impulsivity and lethality. Protective factors are not clearly documented.
Placing him near the nurses' station is a reasonable environmental measure but is not equivalent to continuous observation, and staff cannot see him continuously from a hallway during a short-staffed night. The appropriate response is to request a formal risk assessment by the psychiatric consultant or covering clinician, advocate for continuous observation or a sitter if the assessment supports it, ensure the room is stripped of ligature and sharps risks, and document the conversation and the escalation. Staffing convenience cannot drive the level of observation.
2. Mr. Okafor asks you, 'If I promise not to hurt myself, will you take the sitter away? I hate being watched.' How do you answer?
Read the worked answer
I would answer honestly and without bargaining. I would tell him that I hear that being watched feels intrusive, that his promise matters and I will report it to the team, but that the decision about observation level is made by the clinician based on an assessment, not by a promise alone. I would not say 'if you promise, we'll remove it,' because that trades honesty for compliance and sets up a situation where he may hide distress to regain privacy.
I would ask what specifically bothers him and problem-solve within the plan: positioning the sitter outside the doorway, limiting unnecessary conversation, providing a robe and privacy for hygiene, and scheduling breaks where policy permits. I would also ask directly about current thoughts, plans, and access to means, and document his answers. His request is a useful opening for assessment, not a contract to be accepted.
3. At 03:00 you find him awake, pacing, and saying, 'Everyone would be better off.' What is your immediate response and what do you document?
Read the worked answer
I would stay with him, keep my tone calm and direct, and ask clearly whether he is thinking about killing himself, whether he has a plan, and whether he has access to means. 'Everyone would be better off' is a statement of burdensomeness that warrants direct inquiry, not reassurance. I would not leave him alone, and I would move him to a visible area or summon the sitter or a second staff member.
I would notify the covering clinician immediately, request an urgent psychiatric evaluation, and implement the observation level the clinician orders, escalating to the nursing supervisor if the response is delayed. I would remove any accessible means from the room. Documentation should include his exact words, the time, my direct questions and his answers, the presence of a plan or means, the interventions taken, who was notified and when, and his condition at each check. I would also record that the earlier denial of intent was made and that the picture has changed.