The Undisclosed Prior Loss
Daniel is a CIP reviewing a commercial general liability application for a small construction firm. The owner, Mr. Bianchi, mentions in passing that a worker was injured on a site two years ago and that the firm 'settled it quietly.' The application asks whether the firm has had any claims or incidents in the past five years, and Mr. Bianchi has answered 'no.' He tells Daniel: 'It was minor, no lawsuit, and I don't want it to raise my premium. You don't need to put that down.' Daniel knows the carrier relies on the application to price and accept risk. The policy would be issued to the firm, and Daniel's commission depends on the policy being placed.
1. What are Daniel's obligations regarding the prior incident?
Read the worked answer
Daniel has an obligation of integrity and fair dealing to the carrier and to the client. The application asks a direct question, and the prior injury is responsive even if it was settled without a lawsuit. Daniel should not help Mr. Bianchi conceal it. He should explain why accurate disclosure matters: the carrier prices and accepts risk based on the information provided, and a material misrepresentation could allow the carrier to rescind or deny coverage later, leaving the firm unprotected. Daniel should ask Mr. Bianchi to correct the application, or, if the client refuses, decline to submit the inaccurate application and escalate as required. He should not sign or transmit an application he knows to be false. His commission interest is a conflict that must not influence the advice.
2. How should Daniel balance client loyalty with honesty to the insurer?
Read the worked answer
Daniel can serve both by being candid with Mr. Bianchi. He should explain, in plain terms, the risk of nondisclosure: a later claim could be denied or the policy rescinded, which is worse for the firm than a higher premium now. He can help the client present the incident accurately and favorably, for example by providing context about the settlement and safety changes since then, rather than by omitting it. He should not act as the client's advocate for concealment. If the client insists on the false answer, Daniel should decline to be part of it, document the conversation, and follow his firm's escalation process. Loyalty to a client does not extend to helping the client mislead an insurer; that would harm the client in the long run and breach Daniel's professional duties.
3. What should Daniel do if Mr. Bianchi refuses to correct the application?
Read the worked answer
Daniel should not submit the application. He should tell Mr. Bianchi clearly that he cannot transmit information he knows to be inaccurate and explain the consequences. He should offer to help correct the application or to explore other carriers that might view the incident differently. If the client still refuses, Daniel should escalate to his supervisor or compliance function, document the interaction, and decline the placement. He should not quietly submit the application and hope the carrier does not check; that would make him a party to the misrepresentation. He should also consider whether the client's willingness to misrepresent creates a broader risk that should be recorded, while avoiding unnecessary disclosure of the client's confidences beyond what the situation requires.